Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1002; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t9HHBon1021630 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:11:50 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ZnUyS-0002gx-1b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:08:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ZnUyR-0002go-LL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:08:51 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnUxQ-0001gI-1N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:08:50 +0100 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.131.74]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LsTDk-1aXfap3l5E-0124Ng for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:07:28 +0200 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <08B5A81DD2D14C84874DD10EEB145569@lindavideo> <4DC3B18B20A94764A9ADCC2B5453447A@Clemens0811> In-Reply-To: <4DC3B18B20A94764A9ADCC2B5453447A@Clemens0811> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:07:26 +0200 Message-ID: <33E8ED72DE304278A50B069FE80DDA46@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdEI8jrofS1OgrXQQc+hTfBil0RwZAACHqRAAACZlzA= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ewgKFlJL07lrstLuk4Td7cE9VSlBF2pdE2FkD869DOXpdsQcO6h +1OcSqyR/F0OCkziDxebMeV95e7TOVR+RlcQVvQ/eXBLvYnnWRcMOzSgCfcxDiv9O1v7xHS Iq/UNm6Vrowp5r5haKWToDQjDj2+oNs2auKyvdqKYW/tqwocMe3Dx+BkX+gsQed+/OYR7Ip +k3bvQ9BKDxJKAhgxVxhg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:TVGp7YAPmEY=:4katzTAUTLdL1QCX8Rs/CS 291vfp1cV/xxgSblNlD+0C/XGiDIy/UGcEEoGU+z6fxs2dt7B5tfaJQN0rVafE+B+rej+m4KM pI2fFXrJ52hGlvHqmK4AvmPTp8Riu9ruQWZLUoMaaAdZArAjDi6w0bCZfHAwymKQGB6Eac/R7 5WBkUR8uhs7Rp+EUyvjAxzdbR/poEBHElIe/HvdZkqJwThFNz1LXIT9dTsR2hFDwRLZoxIGtS hF31wA014fM09HW13q4XcYYtTGc6NGH0kfg2Igd2xJlgfwbknR6EFaKy0QALAI2EcHthNP6kE CO+Nm0crYUe/f2nHxGls49vpLimcjBTq3KhwP3RBQG4FKmOHACRSKtWr5V1bmXBMFamEOySDQ QmCLYYnKBW1KGtQkSlRIsY973Yiu9V6nAr/5Kh+KVTBqi+QbivIu6wZkuUEDxz4WMPcq52Hl2 rEL939TAg2xm5EYJroWu7lwD/ZkAj1TmTuBq9Vr+cqNj85woiXwbdlYcSxgDvt79Mzggvz0Wf k+mJiHpIYcHQqfA5LG8p72HVuGLBzPn1jk/oLulD7Ppg+is+Pj33Gn4OuFbUHmRnJUoJxhiSf VODL/9R4A+a4/geljFRb7m5jfVWnBc6PXHCOp/ab4hVJDjdhROX62XYBfl0j3Xii+bVElDmQL MnUk3tnbXEtAnq6ARVEH1uPKVYCq/DIBLX55NK9qkGF4DM9JWjn4LR1RrrNEXcnthItbwEn23 5b2dCv6hdCMNXQB7OC7nbNs4CsrXEG5EnP+EWwljwl/LnnRdHr3ZXKmon30Z4Kg231F2R1nxl NvrGD0a X-Scan-Signature: c0e6e8bcdc231effb9da2003d606d9a2 Subject: LF: RE: RE: TX Toroid Material Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id t9HHBon1021630 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4440 Addendum: Assuming an unloaded Q of 200 for the inductors and a Q of 1000 for the capacitor there are at the 300W level around: 2083V peak across the first L at 2.4A and 18W power dissipation 2090V peak across the shunt C at 2.8A and 4W pwr diss. 1720V peak across the second L at 0.4A and 2W pwr diss Total loss is 24W or 0.37dB or 8.1% 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Clemens Paul >Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:49 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: LF: RE: TX Toroid Material > >Hi Ken, > >I believe two of your component values are off. >I calculate 201µH for the L next to the tubes,625pF for the >shunt C and 1.1mH for the second L . >For the 201µH L I would use iron powder (Amidon #2), for the >1.1mH #43 ferrite. >Use the mini toroid calculator to find the appropiate size >regarding number of turns and >allowed flux with safety margin. > >73 >Clemens >DL4RAJ > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Ken >>Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 5:41 PM >>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>Subject: LF: TX Toroid Material >> >>Dear All. I am having problems with the choice of material for >>the output network of the 475kHz Valve TX. The network is an L >>– C – L, ‘T’ network with an input impedance of 2100 ohms and >>a load of 50 ohms, for this configuration the input L is >>7.7mH, shunt capacitance is 117pf, and output L is 1.1mH. The >>PA design using a 6146 low power or 813 high power work fine >>when simulated using LT spice IV. When testing in the real >>world using the 6146 there is in excess of 800v rms rf on the >>network side of the anode coupling capacitor, but nothing >>after the input L. I can only conclude that I using the wrong >>type material for the toroids, I used the largest size >>(unmarked) toroid which gave me a modest number of turns. I >>have checked the Amidon tables and Iron Powder because of the >>low AL values, which leaves Ferrite, which mix would you >>recommend? The simulations give me output powers 90W for the >>6146, and 300W for the 813. I would be grateful for any core >>material advice . >> >> >> >>Ken Wright. >> >>M0KHW >> >> >> >> > >