Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t63AmIJv018838 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:48:18 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ZAyT5-0001bi-7q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:45:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ZAyT4-0001bZ-VR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:45:14 +0100 Received: from rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.178]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAyS6-00045o-HH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:45:13 +0100 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.155.129.165(GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: c.ashby435@btinternet.com X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090202.55966771.0087,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=28/50,refid=2.7.2:2015.7.3.84216:17:28.394,ip=86.155.129.165,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_800_899, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[165.129.155.86.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (86.155.129.165) by rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as c.ashby435@btinternet.com) id 558FEB150097FA7E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:44:01 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1435920254; bh=Jpbo+6TdvEdmnqf381PnJv2TS/nXQRt1OcWnO7jFsy4=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=JyNjrHFtKxpDIAShLfby4LT1xt/AEN9IlZ9Ug9rVBOhUviHlSkhwDRaaBTOohZg9qBd2aKXbenTKszKhCKUiLvJ5BPYUJ02TX8uZqo/C6xE7m1hpncP+8DJhMb1luTC4pqQSX3KVnXohi1i+ZyRTB/pSUARfS35vpSHNJgTWytc= Message-ID: <319DF66F474646F0BB4ADC856A2861D4@IBM7FFA209F07C> From: "Chris" To: References: <55966387.8090403@psk31.plus.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:44:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: LF: Dual Mode WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3609 Hi Eddie, Tell them your second callsign is now for a club/group etc., then you'll get away with it! Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" To: Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 11:27 AM Subject: Re: LF: Dual Mode WSPR > On 06/06/2015 22:14, Andy Talbot wrote: >> Dual mode randomly switching between WSPR-2 with callsign G4JNT and >> WSPR-15 with callsign G8IMR. +33dBm EIRP both > > Andy > > You are a lucky lad. In the past the use of two callsigns was not so > useful. Now there are often times when I could use my G8 call in addition. > > I understand that Ofcom will - "no longer issue out 2nd call sign to > people already holding a call". > > But you are safe you - "can keep those 2 and we won't remove one of their > call signs". > > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO > >