Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t5P1g3WM026385 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:42:03 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Z7w7v-0006sq-Rz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 02:38:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Z7w7v-0006sh-4w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 02:38:51 +0100 Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7w7s-0000qO-Ga for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 02:38:50 +0100 Received: by obbkm3 with SMTP id km3so38151559obb.1 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:38:46 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=68eSK/YxRxUgLGnQnhTmukUBHE30kmlynV8DSswzb2Q=; b=H+74zQg7Z6gcH8AIXqzU8Ne2ZKXOVaeVSv/QSNv+s6t6F8ZiUSCgMyiIMWrG3rHSzT Bdxbx2D0Wp+xs7Vjj3rfWwhbQkdBvRsDqjJZC+9VPp0F1FiiYxqRHwz8XE0iTMm4BgRG E0M8U0Mfjl7j02YKIqZiOwwOTAlc4JO8xOqgn00UMmhiy4XKx8ptMMmTEvWYvshxl5AE cKdk6mMi5P1G09PnAHjd+wHnnD1VkXm4zVSdK0wwiD0iAUgSJEyW16b7ov9Q5n5cY8K2 oi8KFoPYpQDEDbLBHd4/o8wFjZt9z7OfOe7EWDG0I/5CbvvKbZX03Rc6ZzCK9n+ieNxS k7GA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.229.66 with SMTP id c63mr35104528oih.57.1435196326050; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.13 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:38:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <31A204DF57314D5081D5DF2FAEACCDDB@White> References: <8D27C7D3E7D6748-14A8-F71B3@webmail-vm149.sysops.aol.com> <31A204DF57314D5081D5DF2FAEACCDDB@White> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:38:45 +1000 Message-ID: From: Dimitrios Tsifakis To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: f1498eebf16822c5ea85527a90413169 Subject: Re: LF: 476.181 kHz from indoor loop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3530 Hi Markus, very nice experiment! I did something similar some time ago: http://people.physics.anu.edu.au/~dxt103/472/small_loop/ I would like now to make a larger loop using a 20m thick coaxial cable and try to get that impedance as low as possible to increase the efficiency. I will be setting this up out in the open in order to avoid the influence of nearby object. Good to know that the FKP-1 caps did not have any problems with the 7.8 A current. I am planning to use either the FKP-1 in series as you have done, or some large broadcast type silver mika (5 kV rated). Good fun! 73, Dimitris VK2COW/VK1SV 2015-06-25 5:07 GMT+10:00 Markus Vester : > Hi Mauro, > > this is a single turn loop, around 3.5 m wide and 3 m high, now consisting > of the braid of a piece of RG-216 coax cable. Required capacitance for 475 > kHz is 7.1 nF, made from five 33nF FKP capacitors from the junk box, plus a > couple of styroflex for fine tuning. It's fed through a small ferrite > toroid, 32 turns primary, 4 secondary. Loop resistance at MF is about 0.57 > ohm (Q~83), presumably largely affected by losses from the nearfield > environment (reinforced walls, house wiring, etc). Using 35 W RF the loop > current is 7.8 A. Some pics of the former LF loop tests (32 A, 250 uW) are > at http://df6nm.bplaced.net/LF/Indoor_Loop/ . > > The purpose of this experiment is mainly to be able to provide a signal for > receiver testing, which (unlike my Marconi) can be left on air during > unfavourable weather. But it's really inefficient: An old ENI broadband > linear amplifier converts 140 W DC into 35 W of RF, of which only ~ 2 mW are > radiated. > > Yes it works also for WSPR - a couple of nights ago I did get spotted by > DK7FC, F59706 and SP5XSB. During the daytime the range would be much > shorter, and the signal is definitely too weak for a decode in Heidelberg. > > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > From: IK1WVQ Mauro > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 7:30 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: 476.181 kHz from indoor loop > > very interesting for WSPR tests ! > > few questions: > > - mono-turn or multi-turn ?? > - what are you using for match to TX ??? > > many thanks and > 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ > > > At 12:11 24/06/2015, Markus Vester wrote: >>I am currently running a DFCW-60 beacon on 476.181 kHz, using the >>same 10m^2 indoor transmit loop as previously on LF. With 35 Watts >>of RF input, estimated radiated power is around 2 mW, with lobes >>pointing west and east. >> >>The daytime groundwave signal is visible in the bottom panel of the >>DK7FC MF grabber. Going by the CCIR plots for 3 mS/m conductivity, >>the groundwave attenuation for this distance would be about 23 dB in >>excess off lossless 1/r propagation, resulting in approximately 0.2 >>uV/m in Heidelberg. >> >>Best 73, >>Markus (DF6NM) >> >> > >