Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t5KJC7dO009865 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 21:12:08 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Z6O4B-0004ir-Po for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 20:04:35 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Z6O43-0004ii-LD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 20:04:27 +0100 Received: from mx02.posteo.de ([89.146.194.165]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6O41-0001Wp-HZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 20:04:26 +0100 Received: from dovecot04.posteo.de (unknown [185.67.36.27]) by mx02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A00A725A2113 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 21:04:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posteo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dovecot04.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3mDRJ736lFzFpWB for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 21:04:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5585B936.4050000@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 21:04:22 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <394FEA4DA5AA4542828CB5F63AEE2C88@F6CNIToshiba> <474231660.434744.1432735092592.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <556640CA.1080101@posteo.de> <5566EDC7.2010508@tele2.se> <556F2EBE.2080906@posteo.de> <3E7121C9C1EB4497AAE525F3AA83484C@gnat> <556F3D82.4060004@posteo.de> <7D2076B0D0D645B8B6446CD4CB3F3E3D@gnat> <55842FAA.4060209@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <55842FAA.4060209@posteo.de> X-Scan-Signature: cd16d8c2fb75309db133b7de4adb1391 Subject: LF: VLF vorbis stream, Question Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080905020800070207050109" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3503 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080905020800070207050109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, There are vorbis streams available on VLF by Paul Nicholson and Wolf/DL4YHF and a few more known people from the scene. As far as i know these are in vorbis format, like my MF/VLF stream. What i found yesterday, the data rate depends slightly on the volume level. Now i'm asking myselfe if there is a 'quality' loss when using a low mic volume level ?? To become more precise: The usual method is to check where the noise level of the soundcard can be found, e.g. in Speclab it shows -120 dB for example. Then, if one connects the RX, it may rise to -118 dB (in what ever FFT bin width and Mic gain level). Then, connecting the antenna to the RX may let the (daytime!) noise level rise to -100 dB. Then one knows that the daytime band noise level is 18 dB above the noise level of soundcard+RX and _*everything is fine*_ and the dynamic range is somewhere near 100 dB or maybe just 90 dB but at least it is high enough... *Can this method or thinking be applied when SpecLab is getting its data via a vorbis stream???* I can detect the noise level without an antenna connected and prove that it is about 20 dB lower as when the antenna is connected. So i assumed that everything is all right. But when playing with the mic gain level, i can see that the data rate rises about 10% when adding another 20 dB. So is there a loss of data, resulting in a lower SNR of incoming signals when using a low mic level, although it is still well enough above the soundcard+RX noise?? (Of course i want to keep the mic level as low as possible without a quality loss, to have a dynamic range as high as possible) I just noticed that effect last night and now i'm aksing if there are unwanted losses. 73, Stefan --------------080905020800070207050109 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all,

There are vorbis streams available on VLF by Paul Nicholson and Wolf/DL4YHF and a few more known people from the scene. As far as i know these are in vorbis format, like my MF/VLF stream.
What i found yesterday, the data rate depends slightly on the volume level.

Now i'm asking myselfe if there is a 'quality' loss when using a low mic volume level ??

To become more precise: The usual method is to check where the noise level of the soundcard can be found, e.g. in Speclab it shows -120 dB for example. Then, if one connects the RX, it may rise to -118 dB (in what ever FFT bin width and Mic gain level). Then, connecting the antenna to the RX may let the (daytime!) noise level rise to -100 dB. Then one knows that the daytime band noise level is 18 dB above the noise level of soundcard+RX and everything is fine and the dynamic range is somewhere near 100 dB or maybe just 90 dB but at least it is high enough...
Can this method or thinking be applied when SpecLab is getting its data via a vorbis stream???
I can detect the noise level without an antenna connected and prove that it is about 20 dB lower as when the antenna is connected. So i assumed that everything is all right. But when playing with the mic gain level, i can see that the data rate rises about 10% when adding another 20 dB. So is there a loss of data, resulting in a lower SNR of incoming signals when using a low mic level, although it is still well enough above the soundcard+RX noise?? (Of course i want to keep the mic level as low as possible without a quality loss, to have a dynamic range as high as possible)
I just noticed that effect last night and now i'm aksing if there are unwanted losses.

73, Stefan
--------------080905020800070207050109--