Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t5HNLANF001238 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 01:21:11 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Z5MbH-000197-Tf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:18:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Z5MbH-00018y-KV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:18:31 +0100 Received: from rgout0405.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.218]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5MbG-0005GC-1k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:18:30 +0100 X-OWM-Source-IP: 10.110.12.2() X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090203.55820044.0179,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=11/50,refid=2.7.2:2015.6.17.155116:17:11.743,ip=,rules=__HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, FROM_NAME_ALLCAPS, __HAS_REPLYTO, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_REPLYTO, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __IN_REP_TO, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, CT_TEXT_PLAIN_UTF8_CAPS, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, SUPERLONG_LINE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1400_1499, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __PHISH_FROM, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, PRIORITY_NO_NAME, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from webmail03.bt.ext.cpcloud.co.uk (10.110.12.2) by rgout04.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5581A22A000C06A1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:18:05 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1434583086; bh=6bfDCn02SpXv1ErS4iJ3BHuj/t6sZaHkOrVM/jkX44o=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version; b=BIr/LBln+l8MvguZ6glfuwJ/LMPPHkHuN1KQz03DRIvNw6jgnSqfFBDh2Ha61z6s5axOt4ZrSG1AE+wyYuY11X45W6u1ThiCnq2u74lh935aK4WSgVFsZAc28dN2Ztc47xPQwFLqjRRMnIwBfBF28TsV0lWs4HV8NXVzTSGI330= Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:18:28 +0100 (BST) From: ALAN MELIA To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <5146574.123205.1434583108891.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> In-Reply-To: <5581F953.3060200@posteo.de> References: <5581F953.3060200@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CP-REPLY-UID: 29352 X-CP-REPLY-UID: 29352 X-CP-REPLY-UID: 29352 X-CP-REPLY-UID: 29352 X-CP-REPLY-UID: 29352 X-CP-REPLY-UID: 29352 X-CP-REPLY-UID: 29352 X-CP-REPLY-UID: 29352 X-CP-REPLY-PATH: INBOX X-CP-REPLY-PATH: INBOX X-CP-REPLY-PATH: X-CP-REPLY-PATH: X-CP-REPLY-PATH: X-CP-REPLY-PATH: X-CP-REPLY-PATH: X-CP-REPLY-PATH: Importance: 3 (Normal) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Client-IP: IPv4[86.179.158.201] Epoch[1434583108882] X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: MF propagation over sea water Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3495 Hi Stefan, I'm not sure what point you are making here....maximum skywave daytime range is about 1000km so there is no ground reflection. However a receiiving station near seawater can get a "coastal effect" which is a bit like focussing receibing the direct skywave plus a slightly shorter one which is reflected off the coastal water. This effect is not available on land because of the larger variations in "roughness" over land as well as its absorption. Also over water at 400km there is substantial groundwave, though the effect of this depends on the power radiated and S/N at the receiver For commercial station (Big antennas) the ground and skywave are around the same strength at about 700km. Amateur station do not radiate ground wave so efficiently so the groundwave is maybe about 6dB weaker (this was what we measured at 136 about 10 years ago.) Would that help explain it?? Alan G3NYK ----Original message---- >From : selberdenken@posteo.de Date : 17/06/2015 - 23:48 (GMTST) To : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject : LF: MF propagation over sea water Hi MF, While there is nearly no chance to leave decodes above 400 km in daylight above land, it seems to be no problem above sea water. As soon as the first hop (?) hits the ground on water, the wave can travel to the RX site. At least this attachment shows this effect. The distance crossed in daylight is about 800 km in this picture. 73, Stefan