Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=1 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t4SAt9gI023632 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 12:55:09 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YxvQ2-0002QI-1J for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 11:52:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YxvQ1-0002Q9-Ke for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 11:52:09 +0100 Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YxvPw-00012E-Fc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 11:52:08 +0100 Received: from F6CNIToshiba (unknown [83.153.241.20]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C1E04B027D for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 12:50:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?R3V5w6kgQW5kcsOp?= To: References: <394FEA4DA5AA4542828CB5F63AEE2C88@F6CNIToshiba> <474231660.434744.1432735092592.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <556640CA.1080101@posteo.de> <5566EDC7.2010508@tele2.se> In-Reply-To: <5566EDC7.2010508@tele2.se> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:52:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150528-0, 28/05/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Signature: 3efbf4053c1a70bbeb6c0a0cc657f05e Subject: LF: De F6CNI : MF mobile ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01D09945.17E5BE70" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3333 Ce message est composi et au format MIME. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01D09945.17E5BE70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just for info to Johan and Stefan : WOW ! Yes I rember the experiments of Dave G3YXM. My first QSO with him on = 2 way or x-band 137 CW was 1999/05/15, now 16 years ago ! After I had some = others including a cross band one at 2000/12/30 when he was QSY in GM. Also, I was listening at his signal when he was trying his mobile antenna. = He made a few successfull QSO but at low distance, and nothing heard on my = side at 500 km ! HI. It was true mobile... The very old users of the LF ban= d remember that. HI ! But it was easy, because in the years 1999 / 2003, when I was QRV CW on LF = (250 Watts and a large Inv L), each saturday morning after a CQ we got 5 to= 10 QSO. The activity was important. Now try that, and perhaps you get one = QSO per month ? HI. 73 de Andy =E2=80=93 F6CNI =E2=80=93 JN19QB From: Johan Bodin Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:28 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: MF mobile ? Hi Stefan, G3YXM was mobile on 136kHz many years ago. See http://www.wireless.org.uk/m= obile.htm , scroll down to middle of page. If it is possible on 136kHz then it should be a piece of cake on 475 :-) 73 Johan SM6LKM DK7FC wrote: Hmm, i find someone should do a real mobile (mobile-mobile, with a veloci= ty > 0) experiment. --- L'absence de virus dans ce courrier =C3=A9lectronique a =C3=A9t=C3=A9 v=C3= =A9rifi=C3=A9e par le logiciel antivirus Avast. http://www.avast.com ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01D09945.17E5BE70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just for info to Johan and Stefan :
 
WOW ! Yes I rember the experiments of Dave G3YXM. My f= irst QSO with him on 2 way or x-band 137 CW was 1999/05/15, now 16 years ago ! A= fter I had some others including a cross band one at 2000/12/30 when he was QSY = in GM.
 
Also, I was listening at his signal when he was trying= his mobile antenna. He made a few successfull QSO but at low distance, and noth= ing heard on my side at 500 km ! HI. It was true mobile... The very old users o= f the LF band remember that. HI !
 
But it was easy, because in the years 1999 / 2003, whe= n I was QRV CW on LF (250 Watts and a large Inv L), each saturday morning after a C= Q we got 5 to 10 QSO. The activity was important. Now try that, and perhaps you = get one QSO per month ? HI.
 
73 de Andy =E2=80=93 F6CNI =E2=80=93 JN19QB
 = ;
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: LF: MF mobile ?
 
Hi= Stefan,

G3YXM was mobile on 136kHz many years ago. See http://www.wireless.org.uk/m= obile.htm , scroll down to middle of page.

If it is possible on 136kHz then it= should be a piece of cake on 475 :-)

73
Johan SM6LKM

DK7FC wrote:
Hmm, i find= someone should do a real mobile (mobile-mobile, with a velocity > 0) experiment.



3D"Avast

L'absence de virus dans ce courrier =C3=A9lectronique a =C3=A9t=C3=A9 v= =C3=A9rifi=C3=A9e par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
www.avast.com


------=_NextPart_000_0016_01D09945.17E5BE70--