Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t4REqjBj020769 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 16:52:45 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YxceY-0007h9-LK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:49:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YxceX-0007h0-VD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:49:53 +0100 Received: from mta21.charter.net ([216.33.127.81]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YxceW-0005Uy-6g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 15:49:52 +0100 Received: from imp10 ([10.20.200.15]) by mta21.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20150527144950.LRLO23400.mta21.charter.net@imp10> for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 10:49:50 -0400 Received: from mtaout005.msg.strl.va.charter.net ([68.114.190.30]) by imp10 with smtp.charter.net id Z2pq1q0010fnx6C052pqyC; Wed, 27 May 2015 10:49:50 -0400 Received: from impout002 ([68.114.189.17]) by mtaout005.msg.strl.va.charter.net (InterMail vM.9.00.015.01 201-2473-143-101) with ESMTP id <20150527144950.ZTVE1172.mtaout005.msg.strl.va.charter.net@impout002> for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 09:49:50 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.104] ([216.227.8.181]) by impout002 with charter.net id Z2pp1q00D3uMNyY012ppSU; Wed, 27 May 2015 09:49:50 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=aKJ+qNNm c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=nd42hspxxPzM/7HxP5ZUdw==:117 a=nd42hspxxPzM/7HxP5ZUdw==:17 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Psc215ATnlof_F3yeDkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Auth-id: dzF0YWdAY2hhcnRlci5uZXQ= References: <5561CEB5.3060506@charter.net> <5561ECC1.8030301@kpnmail.nl> <556222D3.11110.8F3A44@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <55623C9A.4060107@charter.net> <000e01d096dd$ac91f5d0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <556311FA.7090205@posteo.de> <55636912.1010105@no3m.net> <55636E96.3040506@posteo.de> <55638C47.1090402@freenet.de> <5563AD3E.2090204@posteo.de> From: John Andrews X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12F69) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:49:49 -0400 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: Re: LF: 630M WSPR T/A - WSPR-15? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id t4REqjBj020769 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3314 > > ...there have been a few MF TA tests in WSPR-15 in the early 630m days, showing that this mode is to slow for the path on that band. These tests have not been very extended though. But most likely there is not a 'gain' of 9 dB over WSPR-2. I would assume that successful detections are even less likely in that mode over the pond. > > 73, Stefan No WSPR-15 receptions here last night. I did notice a couple of 1-2 minute signals, but nothing long enough for a decode. John, W1TAG/1