Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t4OHdPqc010439 for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 19:39:25 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YwZmB-0008LJ-IH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 18:33:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YwZmA-0008LA-UL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 18:33:26 +0100 Received: from mta31.charter.net ([216.33.127.82]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YwZm5-0002oY-Na for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 18:33:25 +0100 Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20150524173319.EEOW10321.mta31.charter.net@imp09> for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 13:33:19 -0400 Received: from mtaout003.msg.strl.va.charter.net ([68.114.190.28]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id XtZK1q0020dCcRg05tZKoE; Sun, 24 May 2015 13:33:19 -0400 Received: from impout005 ([68.114.189.20]) by mtaout003.msg.strl.va.charter.net (InterMail vM.9.00.015.01 201-2473-143-101) with ESMTP id <20150524173319.CAGZ11160.mtaout003.msg.strl.va.charter.net@impout005> for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 12:33:19 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.104] ([216.227.8.181]) by impout005 with charter.net id XtZK1q0043uMNyY01tZKHY; Sun, 24 May 2015 12:33:19 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Xp90OD19 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=nd42hspxxPzM/7HxP5ZUdw==:117 a=nd42hspxxPzM/7HxP5ZUdw==:17 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=V4GvJ4GbClmvxEXArAAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Auth-id: dzF0YWdAY2hhcnRlci5uZXQ= References: <5561CEB5.3060506@charter.net> <5561ECC1.8030301@kpnmail.nl> From: John Andrews X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12F69) In-Reply-To: <5561ECC1.8030301@kpnmail.nl> Message-Id: Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 13:33:19 -0400 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 Subject: Re: LF: Interesting 630M WSPR night Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id t4OHdPqc010439 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3242 Jan, Thanks for the signal! Stefan needs the competition. He has to learn how to play nicely with his friends. John! W1TAG/1 > On May 24, 2015, at 11:22 AM, pa3abk wrote: > > Surprise for me. > Didn't expect my call in your list. > Shut down this morning assuming there wasn't any TA anyhow, didn't bother to check it. > > 100W in a relatively low/small antenna. > Terracehouse enviroment, small garden. Non agressive timing. Frequency on the upperedge of WSPR spectrum. > Can't explain why. Just a lucky shot when peaking :-) > Fun stuff indeed. > > Thanks for the report John. > Jan/pa3abk > >> On 24-5-2015 15:14, John Andrews wrote: >> I had an interesting hour of copy on 630 Meters last night: >> >> 02:30 DK7FC 0.475684 -28 0 JN49ik >> 02:26 DK7FC 0.475684 -24 0 JN49ik >> 02:22 DK7FC 0.475684 -23 0 JN49ik >> 02:18 DK7FC 0.475684 -22 0 JN49ik >> 02:14 DK7FC 0.475684 -24 0 JN49ik >> 02:12 PA3ABK/2 0.475740 -26 0 JO21it >> 02:10 DK7FC 0.475684 -24 0 JN49ik >> 01:46 DK7FC 0.475684 -27 0 JN49ik >> 01:26 DK7FC 0.475684 -26 0 JN49ik >> >> No U.S. stations, just the above. I don't think there was a lot of U.S. >> activity at that point. I had not turned the gear on until about 0125Z, >> and did not expect much for results, as our neighbor to the north was >> here at the lake this weekend, and the noise level was fairly high. >> >> I suspect that this is an example of constructive fading, probably the >> sum of multi-path signals that added just right at this distance for a >> while. >> >> Fun stuff! >> >> John, W1TAG/1 >> Raymond, Maine FN43sv > > -- > pa3abk <-> dordrecht jo21it > Sent by Philips STB-75 with T100 >