Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t4SERmIH024098 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 16:27:48 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Yxyje-0002xo-5A for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 15:24:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Yxyjd-0002xf-Qz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 15:24:37 +0100 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YxyjY-0001t7-NQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 15:24:36 +0100 Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so148916438wiz.1 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kPROZiXLprI9s5UIow/j6rYkpcd6cZDG/kMBK22+n5s=; b=I6NFliIP23VlRE4xzsAlddSkLC5OeRlaNyRFkQ4TiS3vRM/m4cs1R8HVKwb+B3ITDy Qrmp2tjwlOgu08McDA48VXAYIrKUoSAUQ2wzlnBu1rQcPSCKNAOE1SbGOKk6crHJlTQg LLNxwsrggJe9aXuA0IyDn7yW0S4nWL98R4RNhGryoaaZaASkpoHZ++YsIRTq/i6pGEvr fodAlonf3QwHs/EJrwMLrBNQ374Qnx9A6JmDw8qK12OkrHDGVUZYFZDbn9i+gIjbuTdQ Pq0N4r7l0VmCRYmRRW0xrDBmI5N61KnbXgfhWYQdnD5hvSy7mOFoSJXbLTak8V7IQaF/ s5hg== X-Received: by 10.180.88.99 with SMTP id bf3mr61520980wib.75.1432823071095; Thu, 28 May 2015 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([178.16.253.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pd7sm3592164wjb.27.2015.05.28.07.24.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 May 2015 07:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) From: John Rabson In-Reply-To: <556640CA.1080101@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 16:24:28 +0200 Message-Id: <633B30A9-8836-44B6-850C-4DA304E51048@gmail.com> References: <394FEA4DA5AA4542828CB5F63AEE2C88@F6CNIToshiba> <474231660.434744.1432735092592.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <556640CA.1080101@posteo.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: LF: MF mobile ? X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id t4SERmIH024098 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3336 > I recall a few years one of the British Telecommunications journals (POEEJ/BTTJ/IBTE/TCNJ - I forget which name it was using at the time) had an item about a low-loader mounted LF/VLF station which had a radiator supported by a helium balloon. Or was it the Navy's definition of mobile: anything you can move around with a battleship? John F5VLF > On 28 May 2015, at 00:10, DK7FC wrote: > > Hmm, i find someone should do a real mobile (mobile-mobile, with a velocity > 0) experiment. A 1.5 m long CB antenna with a special preparated feed point should work. And i think that the wire works better with a fixed C in parallel, even if this reduces the efficiency. But it stabilises the SWR or better said, the voltage on the wire. Corona? Where is the problem with corona? :-) > Markus, could you calculate the ERP when 10 kV rms is applied to a 1.5m high antenna on a car roof? I bet you have all the formulas in your mind :-) > > Maybe the antenna has 10 pF. I remember i have a 470pF/16kV capacitor at home. So if C = 470 pF and f = 475 kHz, L = 239 uH With 470 pF parallel to the antenna, a moving wire (= changing C) does not make a significant effect i think. > 10 kV at 239 uH at 10 kV is 14A. If P = 200 W, the losses must be 1 Ohm ! > With a good RF litz wire, this is possible :-) > > What would be the ERP and possible distance? > > It would be interesting to try that in WSPR / QRSS-60 :-) I would also drive to someone for making a CW QSO but most likely there is a LOT of QRM when driving... > > More ideas? > > 73, Stefan john.rabson07@gmail.com Researching history of RABSON, BLACKSHAW, GAUNTLETT, VERLANDER and ROBSONNE