Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t41GiCPW015397 for ; Fri, 1 May 2015 18:44:13 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YoE0Y-00049Y-C3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 17:41:46 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YoE0Y-00049P-3D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 17:41:46 +0100 Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1YoE0W-0002Xk-Iy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 May 2015 17:41:44 +0100 Received: by wgso17 with SMTP id o17so95380053wgs.1 for ; Fri, 01 May 2015 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=V/2tJPApHepolB9LYEVkLDPdEnWtWUM8wr9ScoOVkZE=; b=KiHsiC32+Y/Dr5clL0cTRNffVUMWF1I6+M2/o6Riuc501bvStQ4Z7FjQ/wNkGNzTWu MKRKT6Gs40QJa4F2hB/s3e/uN6/3KBy+OS/+G+MmHOVbup0maIXGtd1k6gQd9cpSTKLz OTdIK32GKDyl3SxCrDdF2rzDdswrU+7/hHYip+Uil6op2N733klhYU5rySEkZwol+Zsw w4KungbEf4Lgw2FyI7Kn3SUbFDpUL8BRM+VYerrLVWCfL2UP3g+EX0yDXSPKAcWBlmYV 5OmITv8O8iAp3KkF2rR+vUDH96AXxQzaqYWNZ7qtDDvd6J6Eq3zxI/Djs0e25iIPTNG8 xx0g== X-Received: by 10.180.89.231 with SMTP id br7mr15788191wib.60.1430498503814; Fri, 01 May 2015 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i6sm8234020wjf.29.2015.05.01.09.41.42 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 May 2015 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5543ACC6.8050202@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 18:41:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B0F416E@servigilant.vigilant.local> <553FFAC1.7060609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Scan-Signature: 9769dc1fd6241281ce50b20c60b79e34 Subject: Re: LF: questions about a tx square loop fpr 470KHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3036 PS: I would prefer a vertical loop but just try and see what you get. If you can arrange 2 nearly identical antennas, one H, the other V, this would be interesting. You could use a relay or even 2 transmitters to compare both systems :-) 73!