Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t3AN4nDf015479 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 01:04:49 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YghwA-00088x-Uv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:02:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YghwA-00088o-JI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:02:10 +0100 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1Yghw8-0002sB-4w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:02:09 +0100 Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so12834335wiu.1 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:02:07 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=GBsEHI1CTG3gqIKz6crQ0kuzykDl0b0Zo+faI4P6R0c=; b=jeSC6oFjYkC1Bt3lMyVC1S9aO1hDIJLbGdKPiXF190hPJDSVb5+fORlmfjCeP47EOP FTL51Q3inuMnZEGvaUd/YbALQojNVrnLEG0Iv7ZQbA7mAXLZq64GELZo1fzX30ZZhoae +cE5ZzBHe9iBEKWHPF95mqHL+0ZaIq3M4plsu0GkELSm8rmLORQWGDRkeviMkc1MwMeO Ekx4VuBKJEMEcV7d64oqYxsz4XF+wU3+GNTBGPakOWSS+kxZnQK7PqdNmzYs/rqSgdd/ HhrNFULmMMQP6X8UWNPbZGB8rIRhDnR8PBMUHuhy0xB9ndrfqhuBQYLGGEiFYLocHydz 2E5w== X-Received: by 10.194.21.193 with SMTP id x1mr6798899wje.144.1428706927361; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h5sm249589wjn.20.2015.04.10.16.02.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:02:06 -0700 (PDT) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5528566C.7010703@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 01:02:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <55241671.878.1B2B18E@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com>, <001401d07218$61c9efb0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <5525671E.4764.1ADB85C@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <55257F60.9090207@gmail.com> <5528268F.2020206@gmail.com> <249562EC416A444DB7F5631A010B6CB9@White> <5528435C.4040709@gmail.com> <31738B43EA08427EA5EFF61452B01440@White> In-Reply-To: <31738B43EA08427EA5EFF61452B01440@White> X-Scan-Signature: edae4bc128aa121544439b7b7cfd26a1 Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090604020604000600060806" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2936 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090604020604000600060806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus, Uuuh 137.615 is brave because there are some strong signals close to that QRG from time to time... Maybe the crash of the newer version is due to win7? Could you publish the older version again? A dropbox link maybe? 73, Stefan Am 10.04.2015 23:52, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hi Stefan, > I'm still using an oldfer version (WSJT-X v0.5 r2788) on the XP > netbook, seems to run with no trouble. Got R7NT with -29 dB and was > trying to call him, but he seems to have gone into a fade now. > Had a very nice QSO with Domenico a couple of days ago. At the time we > were around 137615 (as he had announced), almost 500 Hz higher. Well I > guess "dial" frequency can be confusing ... > Best 73, > Markus > > *From:* DK7FC > *Sent:* Friday, April 10, 2015 11:40 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF > > R, does the program work on your side and can you decode him? > > 73, Stefan > > Am 10.04.2015 23:36, schrieb Markus Vester: >> Alex R7NT calling on 137130 Hz at 21 UT, even ten minute slot. >> 73, Markus (DF6NM) >> >> *From:* DK7FC >> *Sent:* Friday, April 10, 2015 9:37 PM >> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> *Subject:* Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF >> >> Hi Domenico, >> >> I'm watching in JT9-10 on 136 kHz "dial". First i want to check if i >> can receive something before i put out the first transmissions... >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> Am 08.04.2015 21:20, schrieb IZ7SLZ: >>> GE LF and all >>> >>> i found (on Alex R7NT website) an early version of WSJT-X that still >>> provide JT9 submodes (JT9-5, 10 and 30). As you known, new versions >>> of WSJT-X do not include anymore the sub-modes. >>> >>> In these hours, just for fun, i'm testing this program under my >>> laptop with W7: it seems stable and working. Since 1800UT i'm cq'ing >>> in *JT9-10* on dial 136.000 kHz + 1615 Hz * tx-even.* >>> >>> See the temporary grabber: >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/aqj0a1qvqf1b919/wsjt-x.jpg?dl=0 >>> updated every 5 minutes. >>> >>> >>> This old version of WSJT-X is available at following links: >>> >>> (R7NT) http://136.73.ru/files/WSJTX_095r3243.exe >>> or >>> (iz7slz) >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/0lntpa9aicbbt5x/WSJTX_095r3243.exe?dl=0 >>> >>> I got a sked with Alex R7NT for Friday night April 10th at 20.00 UT. >>> We will attempt the qso. Maybe other stations can join the sked ? >>> >>> 73 de Domenico (iz7slz) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------090604020604000600060806 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Markus,

Uuuh 137.615 is brave because there are some strong signals close to that QRG from time to time...

Maybe the crash of the newer version is due to win7? Could you publish the older version again? A dropbox link maybe?

73, Stefan


Am 10.04.2015 23:52, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hi Stefan,
 
I'm still using an oldfer version (WSJT-X v0.5 r2788) on the XP netbook, seems to run with no trouble. Got R7NT with -29 dB and was trying to call him, but he seems to have gone into a fade now.
 
Had a very nice QSO with Domenico a couple of days ago. At the time we were around 137615 (as he had announced), almost 500 Hz higher. Well I guess "dial" frequency can be confusing ...
 
Best 73,
Markus 

From: DK7FC
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF

R, does the program work on your side and can you decode him?

73, Stefan

Am 10.04.2015 23:36, schrieb Markus Vester:
Alex R7NT calling on 137130 Hz at 21 UT, even ten minute slot.
 
73, Markus (DF6NM)
 
 

From: DK7FC
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 test on LF

Hi Domenico,

I'm watching in JT9-10 on 136 kHz "dial". First i want to check if i can receive something before i put out the first transmissions...

73, Stefan


Am 08.04.2015 21:20, schrieb IZ7SLZ:
GE LF and all

i found (on Alex R7NT website) an early version of WSJT-X that still provide JT9 submodes (JT9-5, 10 and 30). As you known, new versions of WSJT-X do not include anymore the sub-modes.

In these hours, just for fun,  i'm testing this program under my laptop with W7: it seems stable and working. Since 1800UT i'm cq'ing in JT9-10  on dial 136.000 kHz + 1615 Hz  tx-even.

See the temporary grabber:
updated every 5 minutes.


This old version of WSJT-X is available at following links:

(R7NT) http://136.73.ru/files/WSJTX_095r3243.exe

I got a sked with Alex R7NT for Friday night April 10th at 20.00 UT. We will attempt the qso. Maybe other stations can join the sked ?

73 de Domenico (iz7slz)





--------------090604020604000600060806--