Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t28CXBZm018422 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 13:33:12 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YUaLV-0005Ce-1N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 12:30:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YUaLU-0005CV-PM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 12:30:12 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YUaLS-00005o-KJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 12:30:11 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id t28CU6Sq026040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:00:06 -0230 Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:00:06 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <500BD40DD2264D048560B0DB56B0A146@White> Message-ID: References: <500BD40DD2264D048560B0DB56B0A146@White> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: Re: LF: 136.1725 kHz DFCW Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2582 My pleasure, Markus. The RX setup was far from optimal so your sigs were very good indeed to be seen. Your S/N is not at all bad considering how close your neighbours are. Its nice to see the keying sidebands in the high res spectra. My town may become more urbanised soon and my S/N will likely suffer. OK on the D layer. That explains the transient naature of daytime TA. 73 Joe VO1NA On Sun, 8 Mar 2015, Markus Vester wrote: > Oops, excuse me Joe for having mixed up first names! Guess I need more coffee... > > Thank you for taking a break to look out for my transmissions. > > Around 3 and 5 UT, your signal was strong enough here to show dogbones and 0.1 Hz DCF39 intermodulation. Warren's"XIL" appeared clearly as well, and a couple of traces under 137779 (presumably John's XES) peeped through my own dashes around 3:30: > http://www.df6nm.de/grabber/LF_lastnight.htm > Although I have to admit that my receive SNR is still relatively mediocre, compared to screenshots recently shown by others like Joe, Roelof and Henny. > > All the best, > Markus > > > > From: Markus Vester > Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2015 9:37 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: 136.1725 kHz DFCW > > > Hi Jay, > > thanks very much for your capture, it's much appreciated! All seemed to be working well here, ERP just under a watt, and no fires. > > All the best, > Markus > > > > From: jcraig@mun.ca > Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2015 2:46 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: 136.1725 kHz DFCW > > > Hi Markus, > > Sorry about the quality of this capture, but your sigs were clearly > crossing the pond. Using the tuned 100m wire and the FT-817 without > a preamp. This is your 0100 utc transmission. > > Best 73 > Joe VO1NA > > On Sat, 7 Mar 2015, Markus Vester wrote: > >> It's a beautiful moonlit night... Starting 23 UT, I intend to send my callsign every hour on 136.1725 Hz, DFCW 90. >> >> All reports and captures welcome! Anyone to join in? >> >> Best 73, >> Markus (DF6NM) >>