Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t18MlB4N028513 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 23:47:11 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1YKaYC-0005ts-EE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:42:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1YKaYC-0005ti-4e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:42:00 +0000 Received: from omr-m5.mx.aol.com ([64.12.232.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YKaYA-0006VI-9A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:41:58 +0000 Received: from mtaout-mae01.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mae01.mx.aol.com [172.26.254.141]) by omr-m5.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 9976438000094 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:41:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from White (ipb21bee4a.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [178.27.238.74]) by mtaout-mae01.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id DA7BE3800009B for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:41:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <59BE4EF9AA5A441481B7F111843F3B47@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <54D77171.6000107@gmail.com> <54D7E234.8080004@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 23:41:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20140625; t=1423435316; bh=EzPXwoamussBQAk/zDsToZer1MjRRwTk1IcX1FhJb5c=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wE3twMQtuzFpDPTh3Uqs3FIqqaGWWdeDYqTqxamBlNnC0Wz5TNMXdWeqYyU1Ym6c1 1Iy/cPpGfJ9qvrNyFUJcPV9rqoFp+mFxvKYz80p2Zzp8OsaHONJdvAkC9+HLnF7WbH pl9qx2QbV/4EWUbbUNyF/DhaMe8p6uUzAUt4rWhs= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afe8d54d7e63108f5 X-AOL-IP: 178.27.238.74 X-Scan-Signature: 622b0ca3461797caf37867321c193763 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR MF please Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01D043F8.CF3594D0" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2285 Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01D043F8.CF3594D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan, so it looks like your two receivers provide some spatial diversity, = simultaneously listening to both may be useful to overcome fading nulls = during QSOs. On the other hand, the advantage of a lower noise location = may become much more pronounced in daylight. So you'll have benefits = both night and day ;-)=20 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: DK7FC=20 Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 11:24 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR MF please MF, Thanks to the stations who were on the air. I got some interesting=20 decodes near the -30 dB. Maybe there is QSB between both locations in=20 2.4 km distance? Results in the attachment. It shows again that the improvement is just small, so my home location=20 seems not as man-made-noise-contaminated as expected. The T antenna in=20 the garden is resonanted to MF, so it is unlikely that the RX input is=20 overloaded somewhere... 73, Stefan Am 08.02.2015 15:23, schrieb DK7FC: > Hello MF, > > I will do another test in my garden now, testing my modified MF DC RX. = > It would be nice if there were some detectable WSPR signals for the=20 > test. So if you like, please be actice there :-) > I will upload spots from the remote site... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01D043F8.CF3594D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan,
 
so it looks like your two = receivers provide=20 some spatial diversity, simultaneously listening to both may be = useful to=20 overcome fading nulls during QSOs. On the other hand, the advantage of a lower noise location may = become much=20 more pronounced in daylight. So you'll have benefits both = night and=20 day ;-) 
 
73, Markus (DF6NM)
 

From: DK7FC
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR MF please

MF,

Thanks to the stations who were on the air. I = got some=20 interesting
decodes near the -30 dB. Maybe there is QSB between both = locations in
2.4 km distance? Results in the attachment.
It shows = again=20 that the improvement is just small, so my home location
seems not as = man-made-noise-contaminated as expected. The T antenna in
the garden = is=20 resonanted to MF, so it is unlikely that the RX input is
overloaded=20 somewhere...
73, Stefan

Am 08.02.2015 15:23, schrieb = DK7FC:
>=20 Hello MF,
>
> I will do another test in my garden now, = testing my=20 modified MF DC RX.
> It would be nice if there were some = detectable WSPR=20 signals for the
> test. So if you like, please be actice there=20 :-)
> I will upload spots from the remote site...
>
> = 73,=20 Stefan/DK7FC
>
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01D043F8.CF3594D0--