Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,
	RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t1SBYhNg000786
	for <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:34:43 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1YRfcY-0006VK-0G
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:31:46 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1YRfcX-0006VB-L3
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:31:45 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128)
	(Exim 4.85)
	(envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>)
	id 1YRfcW-0006dP-3q
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:31:44 +0000
Received: by wevl61 with SMTP id l61so24909776wev.2
        for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 03:31:42 -0800 (PST)
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=7yadfdHHNBLRuc0N4X4armBhD0FIeenT8m5t0mevhzU=;
        b=ieBarfPQktXJ46h0oGJXmGYs4vtF9J8yJ80L8iIm5bfAI8O9cGA5HD57csmnnTZ+dl
         OkAIirk8OCSuZPT4Oa94cRPMCCMofaynWt0av8vM/KeAoLvRhck8/usV9Fgr6vDg8ymu
         vj5w0X+0O1Szpo3eZ//+bSNk6FrJZx2s5HfChXJoO4ATI1WHHfpMq1t3WhtfkzrTHmIB
         zJdheemIG5/9e/lbzpWRzsjGdrdi6tBwXyp6h1wztr0HJ8VcPs1Bvz7bcezR8aG4grpw
         PZ9ot71KE0MGtvVOliTc7UNrRUic2lsvpCF3FKtg/fv+JP6hs/sAPoMpaU9CstEC+vJ+
         M18w==
X-Received: by 10.194.83.66 with SMTP id o2mr38104004wjy.55.1425123102187;
        Sat, 28 Feb 2015 03:31:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fo8sm6688501wib.14.2015.02.28.03.31.39
        for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 28 Feb 2015 03:31:40 -0800 (PST)
From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <54F1A71B.5080005@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:31:39 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <54EE1D9A.5000504@gmail.com> <54EE306F.30108@abelian.org>
In-Reply-To: <54EE306F.30108@abelian.org>
X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3
Subject: LF: Todays monitor size
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                 
X-UID: 2474

Hi all,

A few years ago we had the discussion about ideal size for grabber 
/spectrogram dimensions. The consensus was 1024 pixels horizontal.

Would you (all) still vote for that size?

Since > 5 years i'm now using a 22'' monitor with a resolution of 
1680x1050 pixels. Of yourse it would be much better to have wider 
images, covering a longer time...

I would tend to increase the size to 1600 pixels on at least a few 
grabber windows.

Opinions please.

73, Stefan