Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t01Lahrb031121 for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 22:36:43 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Y6nKN-0006XW-Vw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:30:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Y6nKN-0006XN-Lk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:30:43 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Y6nKL-00049c-P9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:30:42 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id t01LUdp6007279 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:00:39 -0330 Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:00:39 -0330 (NST) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <54A51C9C.9060203@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <54A48F01.40804@gmx.de> <54A51C9C.9060203@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 4e3b1488273adbbe9757d6bdd5adf219 Subject: Re: LF: 137kHz grabber Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1709 Happy New Year, Hartmut. Thank-you for the captures. They show the fastest LF transatlantic keying rate (12 WPM) from this station to date. Congrats on your RX setup. The previous record was 5 WPM. DCF39 does indeed cause much QRM. Would 135.83 or 136.5 kHz be better? 73 Joe VO1NA On Thu, 1 Jan 2015, Hartmut Wolff wrote: > Am 2015-01-01 um 02:34 schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> Your grabber is showing good sigs from Jay and your's truly. >> Hopefully you might hear the CW! > > Hi Joe, > > here is a screenshot of the visual copy of your CW: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/VO1NA-137777-2015-01-01-0417.jpg > > In the screenshot the QRM from DCF39 Pulses is very high. I think for a CW > QSO with a station in mideurope a frequency below 137kHz is better. Here is a > screenshot of the DCF39 modulation: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/DCF39-2015-01-01.jpg > > 73 > Hartmut > >