Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id sBJIoQcL031865 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:50:26 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Y22XY-00069M-Gx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:44:40 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Y22XY-00069D-65 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:44:40 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.130] helo=cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Y22XW-0002eD-2c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:44:39 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 9F8101280B9.A4480 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-2e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.34]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8101280B9 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:44:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB1.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub1.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D22D200B0 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:44:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::edaf:341f:90e:f70e]) by ICTS-S-HUB1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::f5f7:d8cc:bee0:28d3%26]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:44:28 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: DLF 153 kHz QRT Thread-Index: AQHQG5Ais1jo4P2uw0iefYLAlOoPE5yXPdGZgAAC48o= Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 18:44:28 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A23493388@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <1418959674.694811.13758.46852@mail.rambler.ru>,<5494273A.6010007@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5494273A.6010007@gmail.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mimectl: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V14.3.123.2 x-originating-ip: [10.112.13.12] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.130 (rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Scan-Signature: 3d5b8cd6516ff44ac46de53952029be0 Subject: LF: RE: DLF 153 kHz QRT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A23493388ICTSSMBX1lunaku_" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1523 --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A23493388ICTSSMBX1lunaku_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, for the broadcasters LF (and MF) is the past. LF / MF transmitters and thei= r antennas are very expensive to maintain and these days the audience is sm= all. More and more LF / MF broadcast stations will go QRT. But let's look at the good side: apart from less QRM it is likely that in t= he future there will be more space available in the LF /MF range and the ha= m bands can expanse or we can even get new bands. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens DK7FC [73dk7fc@googlemail.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 19 december 2014 14:25 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: LF: DLF 153 kHz QRT Hi LF, Obviously there was a decision that DLF (Deutschlandfunk) will go QRT on LF 153 kHz on 31:12.2014! Here is a German article about this decision: http://www.radiomuseum.org/forum/dlf_stellt_langwelle_ein.html This makes me a bit sad on one side since i like the good old AM radio stuff. But on the other side, i know that i'm getting QRM from that transmitter which runs 500kW on a 350m high vertical antenna in 40 km distance. Probably there is a significant noise spectrum beeing radiated which i can see in that short distance. I can see it just a second before 20 o clock in the evening, when they switch from 500 kW to 250 kW. For 1...2 seconds, the AM carrier is off air, which lowers the noise background significantly. So maybe LF reception will be much better next year, i hope. So maybe it is worth for some to listen for the last minutes of DLF LF transmissions on 31.12. this year :-( 73, Stefan/DK7FC --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A23493388ICTSSMBX1lunaku_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <8AAE7ADF7AF5894FADC9F03950C5830A@luna.kuleuven.be> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Stefan,

 

for the broadcasters LF (and MF)= is the past. LF / MF transmitters and their antennas are very expensive= to maintain and these days the audience is small.

More and more LF / MF broadcast stations will go QRT= .

But let's look at= the good side: apar= t from less&nbs= p;QRM it is likely that= in the future there will be m= ore space available= in the LF /MF range and the ham bands can expanse or we can even get new bands.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 

Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens<= a target=3D"_blank"> DK7FC [73dk7fc@googlemail.com]=
Verzonden: vrijdag 19 december 2014 14:25
Aan: rsgb_l= f_group@blacksheep.org
Onderwerp: LF: DLF 153 kHz QRT<= a target=3D"_blank">

Hi LF,

Obviously there was = a decision that=  DLF (Deutschlandfun= k) will go QRT on 
LF 153 kHz on 31:12.= 2014!

Here is a German article about=  this decision:
http://www.radiomuseum.org/forum/dlf_stellt_langwelle_ein.html

This makes me a bit&= nbsp;sad on one=  side since i like the good old AM radio
stuff. But on t= he other side, = i know that i'm getting QRM from that 
transmitter which ru= ns 500kW on a 350m high vertical antenna in 40 km
distance. Probably&n= bsp;there is a significant noise spectrum beeing radiated 
which i can see in that short distance. I can see it just a second 
before 20 o clock in= the evening, when&n= bsp;they switch from= 500 kW to 250
kW. For 1...2 seconds, the AM carrier is off<= a target=3D"_blank"> air, which lowe= rs the noise
background significantly. So maybe LF reception will be much = ;better next
year, i hope.

So maybe it is worth for some to listen for the last minutes of&n= bsp;DLF LF 
transmissions on 31.= 12. this year := -(

73, Stefan/DK7FC

--_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A23493388ICTSSMBX1lunaku_--