Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id sBFDPsEH016734 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:25:54 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Y0VY7-0004A4-KR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:18:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Y0VY7-00049t-AC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:18:55 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1Y0VY5-0001A8-94 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:18:54 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so10449485wib.3 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:18:52 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wDyk/pOpmVlcgIJGjes6R5RW73NKfrNYwQzS6BYX+OI=; b=V02H08MDF6xh49ZqF0qfLVR1HqTq26vL/ZzGNAHQ7yYRX+K7gY11TeLIp3GQJ7SX1i pf9P6qhXe0twMoX5S6JGtDu3fMQsOccN2o3iOmJs0dHB5xzfHuUAEPEQLVpONgZMZjP8 TTvA5gwua0Zcw+Fat3Itq867hr1EmB4bvRYcLBT6fDNSvwcSlYIe81uFAkOlPGlHCzJE Mqbr0dsqAZ+Qn0eLG2PYYoP5cI6PoZKeaAZHJqawYigQ8PBWX7yWsZ6/qm4YvD/KPlbv r7XXZu9PDAILeV5ioa4qfsu/72g+8ASPt7QTUattfhQwLq/u+irQs5WyI1ISvQP4D0uR E65Q== X-Received: by 10.194.108.98 with SMTP id hj2mr52720829wjb.102.1418649532334; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:18:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ej10sm13139123wib.1.2014.12.15.05.18.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:18:51 -0800 (PST) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <548EDFB9.2010809@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:18:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1418644460.73583.YahooMailBasic@web173006.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1418644460.73583.YahooMailBasic@web173006.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> X-Scan-Signature: ebba021850e0a5d4120636e52401e975 Subject: Re: Fw: LF: Antenna Current meters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1501 For antenna current measurements i'm using a simple full wave rectifier out of 1N4148 diodes (UF5404 alternatively, for example), a ferrite core with a high mu and about 40 turns secondary (1 turn primary) , as well as 100nF, a R network to drive an analog meter (100uA or 1mA) for the desired range. I find this extremely simple, cheap, nearly lossless and quite accurate. I do not at all understand why antenna current measurements (in the kHz range) appears to be problematic for some. Does it matter if the device costs 1E-24 or 0.001 or 0.1 or 1 or 5 amounts of your preferred currency? :-) 73, Stefan Am 15.12.2014 12:54, schrieb M0FMT: > Hi all > > A 60p festoon auto bulb from Halfords in series with the ant up lead serves equally well. There is generally no need for antenna current precision measurement its really tune for max smoke i.e. max brightness. A reasonably accurate self calibrating indication of current in the up lead subjectively judging the brightness relative to the DC current rating of the bulb. A more sophisticated set up can be achieved at extra expense. > > 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > > > > > > Sent via my own personal Too-Way (two way) Earth Station to and from the Eutelsat Ka-band satellite http://www.tooway.co.uk/ at approximately 172 degrees Azimuth in the Clarke belt owing to BTs 19th century cable technology inability to provide a good enough 21st century broadband service. I agree for this message to be passed on to BT Plc at 81 Newgate Street, London EC1A 7AJ via the snoops at GCHQ Cheltenham, thanks for your cooperation it is appreciated. > > > --- On Sun, 14/12/14, Alan Melia wrote: > > >> From: Alan Melia >> Subject: LF: Antenna Current meters >> To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Date: Sunday, 14 December, 2014, 16:31 >> Hi all there has been discussion >> about Aerial Current measurement on many >> occassions in the past, and many have built versions of the >> "Clothes Peg" >> clip on ammeter. >> >> Dave Powis G4HUP announced a kit for an HF clip-on current >> meter in the >> December Radcom. After some prodding by me he has had a >> sample tested at 136 >> and 475kHz and as expected the instuments works well and >> sensitivity is flat >> from here up to 30MHz or more. The instructions include a >> simple calibration >> proceedure. Sensitivity down to 100mA FSD allows it to be >> used with low >> power systems where the use of a thermocouple RF meter is >> not posssible. >> >> Dave also produces a board intended to break out the IF >> signal from many >> standard tranceivers for input to an SDR dongle. These were >> intended to work >> in the IF frequency range and use SMD parts to give an >> add-in pcb little >> larger than a postage stamp. A look at the circuit shows >> that this is very >> similar to the circuit used by Roelof (mini-whip) and others >> for use in >> E-field antennas. I believe the coupling capacitors will >> need to be >> increased in size, but I believe Dave can produce these for >> LF to order, >> either as a kit or completed board. He has not yet had a >> chance to try this >> out at LF but it's a chance to experiment at little cost. >> Getting the >> receive antenna away from habitation and power wiring >> is a good move at VLF >> !. >> >> I have no pecunary interest but I admit that Dave is a good >> friend and ex >> work collegue, and an excellent engineer. Look at his >> web pages >> http://g4hup.com >> email g4hup@outlook.com >> >> Alan >> G3NYK >> >> >> >> >> >