Message-ID: <20141223163541.cs0o4fddp76s8kkg@imp4.free.fr>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:35:41 +0100
From: f6hcc56@free.fr
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: 	<579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB023DEDB7@servigilant.vigilant.local>
	<54996F2B.5050202@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54996F2B.5050202@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3)
IMP4-user: f6hcc56
Subject: Re: LF: xmas CW bacon on 630m !!
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	DelSp="Yes";
	format="flowed"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Status: O


Yes, good idea Stefan

Jean / F6HCC

DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> a écrit :


> Thus i guess there will be increased RX-activity by HF amateurs
> listening the first time on 630m. I always hoped there will be more
> active CW stations on the band, initially starting with some WSPR,
then
> moving to CW (too). Now i think it could be useful to run a CW
message
> repeatedly on 473.8 kHz. I will see about the responses and will
> mention reporting stations in the text, like done in the NAVTEX
> transmissions. At least i'm getting regular (about 1 per week!)
reports
> by stations beeing RX-active on the band. Some are on the way to
come
> on air, like e.g. DL6TY from JO44! :-)
>
> In my opinion, 473.8 kHz is far enough away from the CW QSO segment.
> Just tell me if the band is (actually!) overcrowded, then i will
move a
> bit higher.
> Running reduced power from the small 12V PA.
> Right now there in no copy of the signal in Twente, to be
expected...
>
> Also this may be a good study of QSB and propagation for older OMs
> focusing on good old analog modes :-)
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
> (PS: Just kidding about the wrong typed word bacon/beacon ;-) )