Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1169; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s98BPgpf020220 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:25:42 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XbpIi-0003YN-Ig for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:21:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XbpIi-0003YE-Az for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:21:00 +0100 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XbpIg-0004It-So for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:20:59 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmkDAOEdNVQCZMtUPGdsb2JhbAANUot0yBWDIQKBIAEBBQEBAQE4hD0BAQQ4UQsJDwkWDwkDAgECATEUEwgBAbRPlXwBF49XdBaENQEEnUSBLZBeh2ODNQEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: AmkDAOEdNVQCZMtUPGdsb2JhbAANUot0yBWDIQKBIAEBBQEBAQE4hD0BAQQ4UQsJDwkWDwkDAgECATEUEwgBAbRPlXwBF49XdBaENQEEnUSBLZBeh2ODNQEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,677,1406588400"; d="scan'208";a="511768900" Received: from host-2-100-203-84.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.1.3]) ([2.100.203.84]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2014 12:20:58 +0100 Message-ID: <54351E18.6050406@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:20:56 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <621ECFC5FFD44C5989A1DA8C7DE6D149@AGB> <542DB6ED.1050101@psk31.plus.com> <0ED8E8831B5B4AF7B303B9D722D436B0@AGB> <542ED037.5020506@psk31.plus.com> <5431727C.3040406@psk31.plus.com> <54317AAA.90402@psk31.plus.com> <5431A0DB.80403@psk31.plus.com> <54328508.9090008@psk31.plus.com> <442B6841C207457E9BA9503C99BE0AC2@GaryAsus> In-Reply-To: <442B6841C207457E9BA9503C99BE0AC2@GaryAsus> X-Scan-Signature: 0b2d339ae1d48966556dfb6ad64e2bce Subject: Re: LF: WSPR and OPERA test 474.2 dial Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 709 On 06/10/2014 15:23, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > When are you starting your tests ?? > > I have set up at this end. Hello Gary / LF Gary you got the 11:08 Opera8 transmission then.:-) I have put the 10W PA on now for a further period of test, OP8 v WSPR2. Results so far using QRPp show the same as my tests in 2012. Op8 shows higher noise reports than WSPR2, both modes drop out at the same level, OP8 takes four times as long to do it. So I am still looking for WSPR2 to disappear into the noise and OP8 to produce reports. 73 Eddie G3ZJO