Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s94BqJva032681 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 13:52:21 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XaNof-0001Xx-KK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 12:48:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XaNof-0001Xo-BY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 12:48:01 +0100 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1XaNod-00065G-Gh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 12:48:00 +0100 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 10so2234205lbg.32 for ; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 04:47:58 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=mMxJrgbXNsD7K9b/Qbfy865CW0gkmyn1DL039Ej0m9o=; b=AKYf5CmmfwhkkJ/132FocJn7Zpx7gKZ9Fu6B2LnQrRCNpVX7366Fz/cw/64Vi4dpO6 WrUOvxZOQyv39h3dgpwdgg9IMtGhD6r7H6CPvhn5kPuh0xq/mDxbjxJEWaOHMj0BBCrQ YUpC+xfvUFIuqZViQ8elhiGRfDmTZY6y+/MLqOjTuUiqYiSzbPaxjNJ2Choc4rs9pkeM WSQE36FNcTDL1+SzbWRxpevaIGo0tiL/FUNQeglogY/l91ouM+0JKOl6yfCAU4g0pc6K 4aYXhum42Jt+Gkq/BvSP5xTtIj4eIrqmpenHomOKVYq9glMuYKvbMYNznrSDjZ86R7HW HCXA== X-Received: by 10.112.183.233 with SMTP id ep9mr11500363lbc.56.1412423277924; Sat, 04 Oct 2014 04:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id al5sm3654417lbc.6.2014.10.04.04.47.56 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Oct 2014 04:47:57 -0700 (PDT) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <542FDE6B.7020304@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 13:47:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6B3D64E2DE1048DC9CBE57B2F71E8F3A@GaryAsus> <542A795D.8080801@lineone.net> <3437D7A0F19043B28E4F67D1E0989425@GaryAsus> <542B109B.2080402@gmail.com> <542D8A5D.9030005@online.fr> <542DC14D.1090109@online.fr> <542E5137.8070001@online.fr> <00dc01cfdfac$31fd0c30$95f72490$@de> <542FB0ED.7070606@gmail.com> <00ec01cfdfb6$3ee30120$bca90360$@de> In-Reply-To: <00ec01cfdfb6$3ee30120$bca90360$@de> X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Subject: LF: ZEVS grabber please Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000109080505010105050005" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 608 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000109080505010105050005 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi VLF, Could someone of those who are able to monitor ZEVS run a temporary grabber so one (i) can see if it is active? That would be very helpful. I've done some changes on my circuit but now the band looks so clear that i'm asking myselfe if the FET is damaged again, this morning. And i didn't see ZEVS. But maybe it was OFF and the noise is really so low... :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------000109080505010105050005 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi VLF,

Could someone of those who are able to monitor ZEVS run a temporary grabber so one (i) can see if it is active? That would be very helpful.

I've done some changes on my circuit but now the band looks so clear that i'm asking myselfe if the FET is damaged again, this morning. And i didn't see ZEVS. But maybe it was OFF and the noise is really so low... :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

--------------000109080505010105050005--