Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s8SFIqqu002886 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:18:52 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XYGAk-0006SU-IL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:14:02 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XYGAj-0006SL-VJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:14:01 +0100 Received: from mailout01.t-online.de ([194.25.134.80]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XYGAi-0002Iy-53 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:14:00 +0100 Received: from fwd30.aul.t-online.de (fwd30.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.135]) by mailout01.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id E10FE25FAB8 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:13:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (TDsxOsZBrhMme54ktrVJfvFWW-B0ovb3mtzEsgIKCN7bdwhcQgyrcRYRgI3EpERZ+M@[80.128.153.132]) by fwd30.t-online.de with (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) esmtp id 1XYGAg-0aou1o0; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:13:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Hans-Joachim Brandt" References: <54281B0D.4040202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54281B0D.4040202@gmail.com> To: X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 6.10.0006 Date: 28 Sep 2014 15:13 GMT Message-ID: <1XYGAg-0aou1o0@fwd30.t-online.de> X-ID: TDsxOsZBrhMme54ktrVJfvFWW-B0ovb3mtzEsgIKCN7bdwhcQgyrcRYRgI3EpERZ+M X-TOI-MSGID: 873bf9cc-2a04-46d7-a6a3-a4452607d704 X-RFC2822-Warning: Obsolete format in Date: header X-Scan-Signature: 622b0ca3461797caf37867321c193763 Subject: Re: LF: ZEVS RX ant question Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="__Next_1411917180_Part17__" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 521 --__Next_1411917180_Part17__ Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="WINDOWS-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Dear Stefan, I guess You should add a high-pass RC-filter behind your present low-pass filter (so that the antenna itself is still dc grounded) to suppress the lower frequencies you do not want. This high-pass filter may use the two resistors you need for biasing the FET anyway. HW? 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB "DK7FC" <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> schrieb: HI VLF, Yesterday i tried again to receive ZEVS. I didn't know if it was on air but gave it a try. Recorded about 2 hours of the VLF spectrum received on my T antenna (i.e. E-field). I also used a source follower (J310) but added a 3 stage RC filter in front of the gate. I thought i can afford some pF against ground now with the relatively large antenna which must have about 150 pF. I used this circuit: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/ZEVS%20test%20ant.jpg But somehow the spectrum looks not as expected. While the MSKs are still strong, there is much noise below 2 kHz and the sferics appear to be quite weak. See: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/Garden%20T%20antenna%20VLF%201.png I remember from tests with a small active antenna for VLF, where i used 100 MOhm resistors on the gate, that charged humidity caused much noise. Could this be the same effect here? Should i try to use a lower input impedance of the preamp? Maybe you remember, there were certain transistors, several decades ago, they were called bipolar transistors, NPN and PNP. Maybe i should try one of them? :-) Advice is apprechiated. Where are the experts? 73, Stefan/DK7FC --__Next_1411917180_Part17__ Content-Type: Text/HTML; Charset="WINDOWS-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit E-Mail Software 6.0 Dear Stefan,

I guess You should add a high-pass RC-filter behind your present low-pass filter (so that the antenna itself is still dc grounded) to suppress the lower frequencies you do not want. This high-pass filter may use the two resistors you need for biasing the FET anyway. 

HW?

73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB

 
 

"DK7FC" <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> schrieb:
HI VLF,

Yesterday i tried again to receive ZEVS. I didn't know if it was on air but gave it a try. Recorded about 2 hours of the VLF spectrum received on my T antenna (i.e. E-field). I also used a source follower (J310) but added a 3 stage RC filter in front of the gate. I thought i can afford some pF against ground now with the relatively large antenna which must have about 150 pF. I used this circuit: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/ZEVS%20test%20ant.jpg

But somehow the spectrum looks not as expected. While the MSKs are still strong, there is much noise below 2 kHz and the sferics appear to be quite weak. See: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/Garden%20T%20antenna%20VLF%201.png

I remember from tests with a small active antenna for VLF, where i used 100 MOhm resistors on the gate, that charged humidity caused much noise.
Could this be the same effect here?
Should i try to use a lower input impedance of the preamp?
Maybe you remember, there were certain transistors, several decades ago, they were called bipolar transistors, NPN and PNP. Maybe i should try one of them? :-)

 Advice is apprechiated. Where are the experts?

73, Stefan/DK7FC
  --__Next_1411917180_Part17__--