Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s7NK70Jx004316 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:07:00 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XLHYE-0001se-Qc for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 21:04:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XLHYE-0001sV-IQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 21:04:38 +0100 Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1XLHYD-0007Ev-2X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 21:04:37 +0100 Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 10so10549438lbg.6 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 13:04:35 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xWGCKIfJ/32p67v1EnEJmIOWLxxZ/Il3BwxwxeD6vp8=; b=K0d6mmYOo8afmpD48tIIxQgAJPcW5aJAEujuzvLvReKQSEHKvbtA8KopIx3Ji6FOFY cZ3iiRqw4+Ha5yx3uHmvokgOFnqanbnUOj56FbA6x/8zItqv3yzvwMdU28n70wni8NdK vUOH/OwSaP1GmF9JCV2GgK0M92NxPWGaiabd9ET5PCKtv9KrWUJz6i7mUJrS36LspbAp v7tKLNc0lfSu1DW9sioUv9YLrXEYCG7J9rfPyM1rN0i62+7Z4jbjjLuc5tQX+PWWEM6L aiivwEGlvIhC2G+WLEn32hUGmwuCoKL2ydUh3vL/MkYpJNxbxkOcZ+6TljldQTwv6BeQ XLOg== X-Received: by 10.112.8.99 with SMTP id q3mr3114050lba.85.1408824275527; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 13:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm20679980lam.23.2014.08.23.13.04.34 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Aug 2014 13:04:34 -0700 (PDT) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <53F8F3D1.1050507@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:04:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: <8jbnmdum3eahf93hlk7e9o3p.1408816552578@email.android.com> <53F8F208.3070002@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53F8F208.3070002@gmail.com> X-Scan-Signature: e4383209d2ccb9552700d53c0b540538 Subject: Re: LF: MF WSPR please Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 291 Am 23.08.2014 21:56, schrieb DK7FC: > [...] > Can there be a significant QSB on MF over that distance? I never asked > my selfe such questions. ...i mean over the distance between both RX', i.e. 2.4 km. 73