Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=1 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s769q1Hh015670 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:52:01 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XExpx-0001QK-A0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:48:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XExpx-0001QB-0W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:48:49 +0100 Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XExpv-0004h7-A6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:48:47 +0100 Received: from HPG5401fr (unknown [83.153.241.20]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B0514B0085 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:48:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1686C40AF97B4ABE99024972373C232A@HPG5401fr> From: =?UTF-8?B?R3V5w6kgQW5kcsOp?= To: References: <095C9D4E586E45CAA3FE071EA4EA9818@HPG5401fr> <53E0F872.3030500@gmail.com> <64A3B1F0647248229C5C374887AA2FCB@F6CNI> <53E1EC0B.2060309@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53E1EC0B.2060309@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:48:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 X-Scan-Signature: 84016abdd353c82964b6d256164a353f Subject: LF: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01CFB16C.60C03FB0" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 170 Ce message est composi et au format MIME. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01CFB16C.60C03FB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Stefan. I just start my RX now, hunting at your signal. I=E2=80=99ll test the both antennas K9AY (in the 4 possible directions) = and the 2 els out of phase verticals, to see the diferences. On day time = your signal is stable + / =E2=80=93 1 dB. So, more info in the evening. 73 F6CNI From: DK7FC=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:49 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF Hello Andy, MF/LF, Very good!! I see you also like playing in the garden ;-) And i like to = see that my daytime signal is of some use for others. Interesting results. Now, how do the 2 verticals perform compared to the K9AY? Is there a significant gain (better S/N!) compared to a single vertical? Do you have even more space in the garden to get some more spacing than = 0.05 Lambda? :-) Yesterday i have been at my parents QTH, now my car is full of stuff, = wires, coils, ferrite cores, heavy ground rods, a sledge hammer, cord, = batteries, RG58, adapters........ I guess i will also need about 1 mH to resonate the small RX antenna to = MF. This will be the first test. I willl use an air coil and do some TX = tests on that small RX antenna, just to check that it is accurately = resonated and matched to 50 Ohm. I will go to the garden now and play until late afternoon. Maybe you = will see a weak signal on MF :-) 73, QRO, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01CFB16C.60C03FB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Stefan.
 
I just start my RX now, hunting at your signal.
 
I=E2=80=99ll test the both antennas K9AY (in the 4 possible = directions) and the 2=20 els out of phase verticals, to see the diferences. On day time your = signal is=20 stable + / =E2=80=93 1 dB.
 
So, more info in the evening.
 
73 F6CNI
 
From: DK7FC
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on=20 MF
 
Hello=20 Andy, MF/LF,

Very good!! I see you also like playing in the = garden ;-)=20 And i like to see that my daytime signal is of some use for=20 others.

Interesting results.
Now, how do the 2 verticals = perform=20 compared to the K9AY?
Is there a significant gain (better S/N!) = compared to a=20 single vertical?
Do you have even more space in the garden to get = some more=20 spacing than 0.05 Lambda? :-)

Yesterday i have been at my parents = QTH,=20 now my car is full of stuff, wires, coils, ferrite cores, heavy ground = rods, a=20 sledge hammer, cord, batteries, RG58, adapters........
I guess i will = also=20 need about 1 mH to resonate the small RX antenna to MF. This will be the = first=20 test. I willl use an air coil and do some TX tests on that small RX = antenna,=20 just to check that it is accurately resonated and matched to 50 = Ohm.
I will=20 go to the garden now and play until late afternoon. Maybe you will see a = weak=20 signal on MF :-)

73, QRO, Stefan/DK7FC



 
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01CFB16C.60C03FB0--