Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
From: REEVES Paul <Paul.Reeves@uk.thalesgroup.com>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 08:24:16 +0100
Thread-Topic: Re: LF: Re: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me?
Thread-Index: Ac+Ti5t8L3b3SWo6SMC/m498pSJQ+QBcYWMA
Message-ID: <776311A518F6F642962EC561A9184090D5823AFCC4@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp>
References: <1404038426.45740.YahooMailBasic@web173004.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
 <F0A31758897B4FA8B98F37DB906AD7A4@your91hoehfy9g>
In-Reply-To: <F0A31758897B4FA8B98F37DB906AD7A4@your91hoehfy9g>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: Re: LF: Re: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

He's off again........   I seem to recall that Mal has a 'black box' in his=
 inventory - is this a case of 'Pot and Kettle'?

73's
Paul   G8GJA

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacks=
heep.org] On Behalf Of mal hamilton
Sent: 29 June 2014 12:14
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: Re: LF: Re: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me?

Even 160m does not draw the crowds these days except for contests.
Less radio amateurs about and an abundance of appliance fiddlers using blac=
k
boxes and one antenna that fits all.
The preferred gadgets these days are IPHONES, WEB GAZING, AUTO CONNECT
COMPUTER QSO'S
GPS DIRECTION FINDER , but to mention a few
de G3KEV

----- Original Message -----
From: "M0FMT" <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 11:40 AM
Subject: Fw: Re: LF: Re: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me?


>
> Thanks for the comment Mal
>
> With the help of Stefan, Alan, John and co who put up with a
> lot of "OFF TOPIC" mails I now have a reliable work
> around. I just have to re-address my mails either via my
> address book or by manual input. It is only Blacksheep so
> far that gives me this issue. The work around is not too bad
> an imposition.
>
> Stefan's comments about lack of activity especially normal
> CW on 472 are right. Personally I am not very excited by
> WSPR etal. What gets me excited is say hearing Mal, Stefan
> and/or Christian and co hammering away in QSO (in any
> language). There used to be many more stations active on the
> band in the old days here in the UK but not very many now
> (none apart from one Sunday local sched)............:o(
>
> 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Sun, 29/6/14, DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me?
>  To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>  Date: Sunday, 29 June, 2014, 10:10
>
>  True true. But i fear it will happen
>  again some day, due to several pseudo super features.
>  NEW does not automatically mean BETTER, older OMs should
>  know that. But obviously the advertisements are doing a
>  great job.
>  BTW, i remember the argumentation that the new features of
>  yahoo will help to rise newcomers on the LF bands. But
> where
>  are they now? Maybe in the web instead on the bands, but
> not
>  even that!
>
>  73!
>
>  Am 29.06.2014 10:00, schrieb mal hamilton:
>  > LF/MF
>  > My advice from the beginning was not to get involved
>  with Yahoo and stick to Blacksheep which I have always
> found
>  to be totally reliable.
>  > Others like DK7FC agreed. Those shouting loudest for
>  Yahoo at the time have all EXPIRED or FADED AWAY !!!!
>  > I now rest my case
>  > de Mal/G3KEV
>  > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia"
> <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
>  > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>  > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:56 PM
>  > Subject: LF: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me?
>  >
>  >
>  >> Hi Pete we have been declaring for a long time
> now
>  that we have no control over Blacksheep! So we could not
>  "black-ball" you even if we should really want to :-))
>  >>
>  >> There has been a long running problem with
> certain
>  ISP Yahoo being one. In past years the majority of forged
>  address spam came from Yahoo, gmail and others. The have
> now
>  instituted some form of authorisation which causes a lot
> of
>  their legitimate mail to be bounced by other sites.
>  >>
>  >> You may remember before the Yahoo group was set
> up,
>  and we still had access to the administator, that he
>  implimented a facility which was available to check that
>  mail was genuinely from the quoted address, the immediate
>  result was mail from Yahoo, aol, gmail and a few other
>  started bouncing because they wouldnt use the facility
>  themselves....the blacksheep admin had to take it off
> again
>  to allow normal operation. It now seems they are having so
>  many complaints they have started using it or something
>  similar and unmarked mails from blacksheep are being
> bounced
>  by your Yahoo account!!...........or its something like
>  that.
>  >>
>  >> Alan
>  >> G3NYK
>  >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "M0FMT" <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
>  >> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>  >> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:37 PM
>  >> Subject: LF: Fw: Black balled .... me?
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> --- On Tue, 24/6/14, M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
>  wrote:
>  >>
>  >>> From: M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
>  >>> Subject: Black balled .... me?
>  >>> To: rsbg_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>  >>> Date: Tuesday, 24 June, 2014, 19:31
>  >>> Hi all
>  >>> All my mails are coming back from Blacksheep
>  and have done
>  >>> for ages now. Have I been black balled on
> this
>  reflector? I
>  >>> don't mind but it would be nice to know and I
>  won't bother
>  >>> in future......}o(
>  >>> Who knows????
>  >>> 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>
>
>