Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp514044igb; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:57:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.13.113 with SMTP id g17mr10106347wic.48.1403218649640; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hl6si8937214wjb.55.2014.06.19.15.57.29 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WxkAo-0007XP-Ip for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:47:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WxkAo-0007XG-Bk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:47:10 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WxkAm-00064J-3M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:47:09 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s5JLl4WS015178 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:17:05 -0230 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:17:04 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <53A28B53.80407@online.fr> Message-ID: References: <53A28B53.80407@online.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Bonjour Jean-Pierre. Thank-you for the report. It was a pleasant surprise! 73 Joe VO1NA [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.153.232.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA last night on 477.7 MHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Bonjour Jean-Pierre. Thank-you for the report. It was a pleasant surprise! 73 Joe VO1NA On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, F1AFJ wrote: > Hello Joe , > > Good copy of "NA" : 00:15 > 01:25 utc > > 73 , Jean-Pierre f1afj > > -- > http://jpmere.online.fr/Sommaire.htm > >