Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp205196igb; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:42:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.133.1 with SMTP id oy1mr35273171wjb.87.1403606536335; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id da7si26767670wjb.137.2014.06.24.03.42.15 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WzNiT-0006XL-Ag for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:12:41 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WzNiT-0006XC-2v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:12:41 +0100 Received: from smtpdg7.aruba.it ([62.149.158.237] helo=smtpdg10.aruba.it) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WzNiN-0001c2-6N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:12:39 +0100 Received: from mauro.stmb.it ([87.9.192.135]) by smtpcmd04.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id JACX1o00S2vk1X301ACXKk; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:12:32 +0200 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:12:29 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org,rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: IK1WVQ Mauro Cc: roelof@ndb.demon.nl In-Reply-To: References: <1403433467.29408.YahooMailBasic@web173001.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1WyhZD-2GWXa40@fwd29.t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 62.149.158.237 (smtpdg7.aruba.it) used invalid HELO/EHLO smtpdg10.aruba.it - verification failed X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: hi, - please give us the inductance value required for T ... This is because I would use some "77" grade toroids, and it is necessary to recalculate the number of turns for this one.. - If the current is increased, is the IP3 better ??? [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.149.158.237 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Message-Id: Subject: Re: LF: Fw: SAQ transmissions 2014-06-29 and 2014-07-02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false hi, - please give us the inductance value required for T ... This is because I would use some "77" grade toroids, and it is necessary to recalculate the number of turns for this one.. - If the current is increased, is the IP3 better ??? - Is the output level enough to drive 30 meters of 75 ohm TVSAT cable ??? compliments for you project, simpler of the classic "PA0RDT" ... 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ At 17.09 22/06/2014, Roelof Bakker wrote: >Hello Hajo, > >For optimum VLF use the BN-43-2402 should be a BN-73-2402 > >73, >Roelof, PAoRDT