Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp232807igb; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 02:17:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.22.201 with SMTP id g9mr1169585wjf.98.1404033430727; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 02:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id by4si5590858wib.11.2014.06.29.02.17.10 for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 02:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1X1A2A-0005OF-VP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:00:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1X1A2A-0005O6-JP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:00:22 +0100 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1X1A28-0004o2-6i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:00:21 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuoMABjHr1NcF1V1/2dsb2JhbABZgw2EGoU7vRYFAwKBBxd1g34FAQEEAQgBARkVHgEBJgYBAQMFAgEDEQMBAQEBAgIFDBUCAhQBBBoGFggGEwgCAQIDAYgdAwkMqRycaBeBK4s1gVYBAVwEDIJhNoEWBYRjBYwFh3mPY4YSg0M8gTqBMw X-IPAS-Result: AuoMABjHr1NcF1V1/2dsb2JhbABZgw2EGoU7vRYFAwKBBxd1g34FAQEEAQgBARkVHgEBJgYBAQMFAgEDEQMBAQEBAgIFDBUCAhQBBBoGFggGEwgCAQIDAYgdAwkMqRycaBeBK4s1gVYBAVwEDIJhNoEWBYRjBYwFh3mPY4YSg0M8gTqBMw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,569,1400022000"; d="scan'208";a="507490687" Received: from host-92-23-85-117.as13285.net (HELO your91hoehfy9g) ([92.23.85.117]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 29 Jun 2014 09:00:18 +0100 Message-ID: <86E71FC3172F4E64A009D043A3ED486B@your91hoehfy9g> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <1403635034.86224.YahooMailBasic@web173006.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <3C5FBFC479F54BC790FCC6903E495096@gnat> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:00:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF/MF My advice from the beginning was not to get involved with Yahoo and stick to Blacksheep which I have always found to be totally reliable. Others like DK7FC agreed. Those shouting loudest for Yahoo at the time have all EXPIRED or FADED AWAY !!!! I now rest my case de Mal/G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:56 PM Subject: LF: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 64a43ebf6189d3fbac7adf77f3718769 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false LF/MF My advice from the beginning was not to get involved with Yahoo and stick to Blacksheep which I have always found to be totally reliable. Others like DK7FC agreed. Those shouting loudest for Yahoo at the time have all EXPIRED or FADED AWAY !!!! I now rest my case de Mal/G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:56 PM Subject: LF: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me? > Hi Pete we have been declaring for a long time now that we have no control > over Blacksheep! So we could not "black-ball" you even if we should really > want to :-)) > > There has been a long running problem with certain ISP Yahoo being one. In > past years the majority of forged address spam came from Yahoo, gmail and > others. The have now instituted some form of authorisation which causes a > lot of their legitimate mail to be bounced by other sites. > > You may remember before the Yahoo group was set up, and we still had > access to the administator, that he implimented a facility which was > available to check that mail was genuinely from the quoted address, the > immediate result was mail from Yahoo, aol, gmail and a few other started > bouncing because they wouldnt use the facility themselves....the > blacksheep admin had to take it off again to allow normal operation. It > now seems they are having so many complaints they have started using it or > something similar and unmarked mails from blacksheep are being bounced by > your Yahoo account!!...........or its something like that. > > Alan > G3NYK > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "M0FMT" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:37 PM > Subject: LF: Fw: Black balled .... me? > > > > --- On Tue, 24/6/14, M0FMT wrote: > >> From: M0FMT >> Subject: Black balled .... me? >> To: rsbg_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Date: Tuesday, 24 June, 2014, 19:31 >> Hi all >> All my mails are coming back from Blacksheep and have done >> for ages now. Have I been black balled on this reflector? I >> don't mind but it would be nice to know and I won't bother >> in future......}o( >> Who knows???? >> 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX > >