Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp169840igb; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:13:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.221.229 with SMTP id qh5mr25834142wic.33.1401747192690; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:13:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id yq5si28262044wjc.37.2014.06.02.15.13.12 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:13:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WrZRb-0006ri-6o for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:06:59 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WrZRJ-0006rT-LY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:06:41 +0100 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([195.4.92.90]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WrZRI-00006F-0o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:06:40 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.141] (helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.82 #1) id 1WrZRG-0003q3-Tz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:06:38 +0200 Received: from localhost ([::1]:51472 helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #1) id 1WrZRG-0003V2-QK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:06:38 +0200 Received: from mx9.freenet.de ([195.4.92.19]:46723) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.82 #1) id 1WrZPI-0001uc-Jk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:04:36 +0200 Received: from blfd-4d0881d8.pool.mediaways.net ([77.8.129.216]:3543 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx9.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.82 #1) id 1WrZPI-0001UO-6o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:04:36 +0200 Message-ID: <538CE6ED.4070202@freenet.de> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 23:04:45 +0200 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <538CD411.9000608@abelian.org> <538CDB90.5030702@freenet.de> <538CE1FF.1090002@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <538CE1FF.1090002@abelian.org> X-Originated-At: 77.8.129.216!3543 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, Many thanks for the information. By coincidence, I am experimenting with an STM32F407 "discovery" board, which has a couple of fast A/D converters and a DSP-friendly instruction set (an ARM Cortex M4F). May be suited to digitize three analog inputs from three antennas (+ much easier GPS sync than on a PC). It's in a very early stage of development, though. About 15 Euro for a uC development board with built-in debugger ("ST-Link"), 1 MByte fast internal Flash, and 192 kByte internal SRAM..quite tempting to do something senseful with it. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.90 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: VLF: W4DEX trans-Atlantic at 8971 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, Many thanks for the information. By coincidence, I am experimenting with an STM32F407 "discovery" board, which has a couple of fast A/D converters and a DSP-friendly instruction set (an ARM Cortex M4F). May be suited to digitize three analog inputs from three antennas (+ much easier GPS sync than on a PC). It's in a very early stage of development, though. About 15 Euro for a uC development board with built-in debugger ("ST-Link"), 1 MByte fast internal Flash, and 192 kByte internal SRAM..quite tempting to do something senseful with it. Regards, Wolf . Am 02.06.2014 22:43, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > Wolf wrote: > > do you have an estimation about how many percent of the > > transmission time were actually 'blanked' due to sferics ? > > Yes, blanking factor is about 25%. Varies from hour to > hour in the range 20% to 35% and not necessarily more at > night. > > I combine E and H signals and steer the pattern, then > apply blanking to the combined signal (as opposed to > independent blanking of the three components before mixing). > > Blanking threshold is 1.2 times the moving mean amplitude. > I think the default threshold in Spectrum Lab is a bit higher > but the effect of that difference is very small. > > I band limit to 8970 +/- 1500 Hz before blanking. Much > narrower and the sferics become stretched and blanking > less effective. > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > > >