Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp52267igb; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:42:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.231.41 with SMTP id td9mr20780498wic.55.1403473339590; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n7si16197391wja.159.2014.06.22.14.42.18 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WyoFG-0001a3-Nj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 21:20:10 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WyoFG-0001Zu-9W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 21:20:10 +0100 Received: from mailout12.t-online.de ([194.25.134.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WyoFE-0002tc-5J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 21:20:09 +0100 Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de (fwd09.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.151]) by mailout12.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 03C94173C37 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:20:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (GFWcjZZHrhXumy0BGVCDUag+d+Iv9+smxQhkNThW0K458QBBs3RK3oaA7CQ+8k7wED@[93.201.46.20]) by fwd09.t-online.de with esmtp id 1WyoFC-0YJoRc0; Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:20:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de References:<1403453502.98065.YahooMailBasic@web173006.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To:<1403453502.98065.YahooMailBasic@web173006.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> To: X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 6.08.0003 Date: 22 Jun 2014 20:20 GMT Message-ID: <1WyoFC-0YJoRc0@fwd09.t-online.de> X-ID: GFWcjZZHrhXumy0BGVCDUag+d+Iv9+smxQhkNThW0K458QBBs3RK3oaA7CQ+8k7wED X-TOI-MSGID: 705be20e-6dba-419e-8fc8-5bc20efded99 X-RFC2822-Warning: Obsolete format in Date: header X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Pete, no problem any more, since one year I do have this portable receiver, and my interference problem has been solved. 73 Ha-Jo. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.25.134.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: Re: LF: Fw: SAQ transmissions 2014-06-29 and 2014-07-02 Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dear Pete, no problem any more, since one year I do have this portable receiver, and my interference problem has been solved. 73 Ha-Jo. "M0FMT" schrieb: > Hi all > > My comments were for those who had yet to hear SAQ first hand. Hajo the expert has provided an idea which I for one will be making thanks Reolof. I live next to 11kV country-side mains feed here. It's damp, frosty and foggy days (or a broken insulator) not all necessarily at the same time when I suffer. I have a mast up 15m plus the 7/8ths 2m whip on top (clear of the house) that I use for receiving on MF/LF at times. The signals are weak from it but I use a dual gate mosfet which is very low noise that brings the signal up. The coax is grounded and shields domestic noise to some extent, SAQ comes in quite well on that set up. You don't need a lot of gain into the sound card for the simple SAQ reception. But most modern RTX have very high gain front ends also mostly I use it straight into the RX. However noise is a big issue with so many sources now. > > Anyway good luck Hajo. > > 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > -------------------------------------------- > On Sun, 22/6/14, Roelof Bakker wrote: > > Subject: Re: LF: Fw: SAQ transmissions 2014-06-29 and 2014-07-02 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Sunday, 22 June, 2014, 16:09 > > Hello Hajo, > > For optimum VLF use the > BN-43-2402 should be a BN-73-2402 > > 73, > Roelof, PAoRDT > > > >