Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.208.67 with SMTP id mc3csp65511igc; Wed, 21 May 2014 02:26:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.119.172 with SMTP id kv12mr57332589pab.34.1400664366203; Wed, 21 May 2014 02:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qp5si5239648pab.192.2014.05.21.02.26.04 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 02:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Wn2Kw-0006C2-HB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:57:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Wn2Ke-0006Bj-9W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:57:04 +0100 Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.35]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn2Kc-0000OE-Ly for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:57:03 +0100 Received: from pc-roelof (ndb.demon.nl [82.161.81.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4L8v0qB095252 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:57:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@ndb.demon.nl) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <537B3F53.1000301@gmail.com> <537BF4D3.6050903@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:57:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Roelof Bakker" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <537BF4D3.6050903@gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Stefan, Monitoring daytime reception of NDB's over a sea path compared to a full land path revealed an advantage of about four times for a sea path. 73, Roelof, PAoRDT [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.109.24.35 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 7b4dbd93955117b98f3a6ac4d7602f88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: LF: Re: MF propagation Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Stefan, Monitoring daytime reception of NDB's over a sea path compared to a full land path revealed an advantage of about four times for a sea path. 73, Roelof, PAoRDT