Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp195319igb; Wed, 28 May 2014 17:43:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.174.33 with SMTP id bp1mr4250920pbc.74.1401324208963; Wed, 28 May 2014 17:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hd2si25666995pbb.196.2014.05.28.17.43.28 for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 17:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Wpo5N-0006TX-UY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 01:20:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Wpo5K-0006TO-Ja for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 01:20:42 +0100 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Wpo5I-0005bN-Fr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 May 2014 01:20:41 +0100 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s4T0KcWN030498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 21:50:38 -0230 Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 21:50:38 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <53867125.8020603@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1401317170.26758.YahooMailBasic@web173006.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <53866B57.1010300@gmail.com> <53867125.8020603@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Still QRP (50 watts) until the bits for the new TX arrives... 73 Joe [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.153.232.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: LF: 472 tonight / Also 477.7 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Stefan, Still QRP (50 watts) until the bits for the new TX arrives... 73 Joe On Thu, 29 May 2014, DK7FC wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Which power level pse? > > 73, GL, Stefan > > Am 29.05.2014 01:22, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >> >> Hello Group, >> >> QRSS10 and 12 WPM CW tonight and for the nest few days. >> >> 73 >> Joe VO1NA >> > >