Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp25618igc; Tue, 6 May 2014 08:31:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.149.102 with SMTP id tz6mr7492322pab.76.1399390266332; Tue, 06 May 2014 08:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ov9si275938pbc.256.2014.05.06.08.31.05 for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 08:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Whgod-0007Rz-IN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:57:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Whgoc-0007Rq-Nf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:57:54 +0100 Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WhgoZ-0006zm-EU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:57:53 +0100 Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s7so2944330qap.6 for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+siS/oIhijGL3cd1Q4onKMxwQdigutHB9rWIEMVwFts=; b=ZPph8aWYCjMqYKQMZhvJLfoglh6jI58Xq+MqxYBuwao9pI1zMK3b0sQ83hhVLKUHhi aUb5jANR1AYQuZQuRZYN8CqhrDGG2xxhQC4a9zh02jesAnJIgBnkSTvG9Fzi8+zAlHZX 1qZiAPaiFJxj8SoTHB7c/gdoM0nJa70ihUu3WKDazWauGtL2idQxpNH0DWmghmoS4Dkh dJxvDVGTGOnrsbqBa/hiTt2D8xr8sdgG6nDKKyHjb295OiUP7Vtfk8FIfdac5uEyTGFO ACvvDu72FZstDE41O0skQVmZDPE1NLAYKXBUGJZMsKiSXRleArIsXGtMyzQU5xQkPzuk 0LWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.12.74 with SMTP id w10mr55924529qaw.34.1399388269025; Tue, 06 May 2014 07:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.163.230 with HTTP; Tue, 6 May 2014 07:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 10:57:48 -0400 Message-ID: From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Andy, Some years ago Bob W2ZM using the experimental call WE2XGR/6 worked Finbar EI0CF on CW and also ssb (Bob ran ssb, Finbar ran CW). Somewhere I have a .wav file from Finbar with his reception of Bob's ssb signal. I know that there have been other T/A contacts but I don't recall all the details. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.216.47 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (wd2xgj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3f96c9ff152a6a60cc2344b4cc7e7dd2 Subject: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141a466ada7d504f8bc78a9 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --089e0141a466ada7d504f8bc78a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy, Some years ago Bob W2ZM using the experimental call WE2XGR/6 worked Finbar EI0CF on CW and also ssb (Bob ran ssb, Finbar ran CW). Somewhere I have a .wav file from Finbar with his reception of Bob's ssb signal. I know that there have been other T/A contacts but I don't recall all the details. 73 Warren K2ORS On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Andr=C3=A9 Guy=C3=A9 wrote: > Hi to all. > > Sure, it is not necessary to plan QRO for CW coming from Joe. > > Here I heard often the signal coming from Joe last winter, and also just > some last days around 0200 TU on QRSS with 559 good signal by ears ! > > I heard also some years ago CW QSO around 507 kHz between local US > stations, and also between Finbar and VE / W stations. Did you remember > about these tests ? > > Here I have a QRP MF TX, so I cannot play that. But I am sure that any > west EU station using 10 Watts ERP, can manage again this challenge, when > the conditions are good. > > But my ultimate and main question is : why some years ago there was some > activity on the old CW MF band from VE / W, and nothing now ? > > Andy. F6CNI. > > -----Message d'origine----- From: C. Groeger > Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:38 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. > > Hi Joe! > 5 watts eirp sounds very well! > Do you plan QRO for your CW? > I think then really two way CW should be possible over our distance! > 73, df5qg > > Christian Groeger > > jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: > > Hi Graham, >> >> I couldn't find antthing on modes or BW. The last LOA for the band >> didn't specify mode/BW either and was 5 W ERP not EIRP. Anyway, >> it's a good day for Canadians and those hoping to work them on 630. >> >> The CW beacon will be on again tonight and yours truly will certainly >> consider requests for skeds! >> >> 73 >> Joe >> >> On Sun, 4 May 2014, Graham wrote: >> >> Better late than never Joe, just in time for the next dip in sol= ar >>> activity as well ! >>> >>> No mention of modes and B/W in the sub clauses , other than the >>> usual >>> 'no jam' ? >>> >>> 73, G, >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: >>> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:11 AM >>> To: >>> Subject: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. >>> >>> Hello Group, >>>> >>>> For those who didn't get the CW message on 477.7 kHz last night, I'm >>>> happy to report that 472-479 kHz is now available to all Canadian >>>> amateurs. Per the ITU WRC12 approval of 14 February 2012, we may >>>> use 5 watts EIRP on the band but may not cause interference to >>>> the primary users. For further info, please see the Industry Canada >>>> web page, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf10759.html >>>> which was published online last Thursday 1 May. >>>> >>>> 73 >>>> Joe VO1NA >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > --- > Ce courrier =C3=A9lectronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveil= lant > parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. > http://www.avast.com > > > --=20 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 --089e0141a466ada7d504f8bc78a9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andy,

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Some years ago Bob W= 2ZM using the experimental call WE2XGR/6 worked Finbar EI0CF on CW and also= ssb (Bob ran ssb, Finbar ran CW). =C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Somewhere= I have a .wav file from Finbar with his reception of Bob's ssb signal.=
I know that there have been other T/A contacts but I don't recall = all the details.

73 Warren K2ORS


=



On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Andr=C3=A9 Guy=C3=A9 <= ;andre.guye1@= aliceadsl.fr> wrote:
Hi to all.

Sure, it is not necessary to plan QRO for CW coming from Joe.

Here I heard often the signal coming from Joe last winter, and also just so= me last days around 0200 TU on QRSS with 559 good signal by ears !

I heard also some years ago CW QSO around 507 kHz between local US stations= , and also between Finbar and VE / W stations. Did you remember about these= tests ?

Here I have a QRP MF TX, so I cannot play that. But I am sure that any west= EU station using 10 Watts ERP, can manage again this challenge, when the c= onditions are good.

But my ultimate and main question is : why some years ago there was some ac= tivity on the old CW MF band from VE / W, and nothing now ?

Andy. F6CNI.

-----Message d'origine----- From: C. Groeger
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:38 PM
To: rsgb_= lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m.

Hi Joe!
5 watts eirp sounds very well!
Do you plan QRO for your CW?
I think then really two way CW should be possible over our distance!
73, df5qg

Christian Groeger

jcraig@mun.ca schrie= b:

Hi Graham,

I couldn't find antthing on modes or BW. =C2=A0The last LOA for the ban= d
didn't specify mode/BW either and was 5 W ERP not EIRP. =C2=A0Anyway, it's a good day for Canadians and those hoping to work them on 630.

The CW beacon will be on again tonight and yours truly will certainly
consider requests for skeds!

73
Joe

On Sun, 4 May 2014, Graham wrote:

Better late than =C2=A0never Joe, =C2=A0just =C2=A0in time =C2=A0for the = =C2=A0next =C2=A0dip =C2=A0in solar
activity as well !

No =C2=A0mention =C2=A0of =C2=A0modes =C2=A0and =C2=A0B/W in the =C2=A0sub = =C2=A0clauses , other =C2=A0than the usual
'no jam' ?

73, G,

--------------------------------------------------
From: <jcraig@mun.ca<= /a>>
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:11 AM
To: <r= sgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m.

Hello Group,

For those who didn't get the CW message on 477.7 kHz last night, I'= m
happy to report that 472-479 kHz is now available to all Canadian
amateurs. =C2=A0 Per the ITU WRC12 approval of 14 February 2012, we may
use 5 watts EIRP on the band but may not cause interference to
the primary users. =C2=A0For further info, please see the Industry Canada web page, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/= sf10759.html
which was published online last Thursday 1 May.

73
Joe VO1NA







---
Ce courrier =C3=A9lectronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveilla= nt parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active.
http://www.avast.com=





--
73 Warren K2= ORS
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 WD2XGJ
= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 WD2XSH/23
=C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 WE2XEB/2
=C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 WE2XGR/1

=C2=A0
--089e0141a466ada7d504f8bc78a9--