Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp20584igc; Tue, 6 May 2014 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.187.225 with SMTP id fv1mr21490081wic.14.1399386665471; Tue, 06 May 2014 07:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pl6si5740293wjc.86.2014.05.06.07.31.04 for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 07:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Whfvf-0007D4-F6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:01:07 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Whfvf-0007Cv-0Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:01:07 +0100 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Whfvc-0006jv-Eb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:01:05 +0100 Received: from F6CNI (unknown [83.153.241.20]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id BBCE99400FD for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 16:00:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: From: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEd1ecOp?= To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 16:01:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3522.110 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3522.110 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140506-0, 06/05/2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi to all. Sure, it is not necessary to plan QRO for CW coming from Joe. Here I heard often the signal coming from Joe last winter, and also just some last days around 0200 TU on QRSS with 559 good signal by ears ! [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.27.42.1 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 1.9 STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES X-Scan-Signature: 1908b49407fc556987226b536cc4bad0 Subject: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop ! Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi to all. Sure, it is not necessary to plan QRO for CW coming from Joe. Here I heard often the signal coming from Joe last winter, and also just some last days around 0200 TU on QRSS with 559 good signal by ears ! I heard also some years ago CW QSO around 507 kHz between local US stations= , and also between Finbar and VE / W stations. Did you remember about these tests ? Here I have a QRP MF TX, so I cannot play that. But I am sure that any west= EU station using 10 Watts ERP, can manage again this challenge, when the conditions are good. But my ultimate and main question is : why some years ago there was some activity on the old CW MF band from VE / W, and nothing now ? Andy. F6CNI. -----Message d'origine----- From: C. Groeger Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:38 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. Hi Joe! 5 watts eirp sounds very well! Do you plan QRO for your CW? I think then really two way CW should be possible over our distance! 73, df5qg Christian Groeger jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: >Hi Graham, > >I couldn't find antthing on modes or BW. The last LOA for the band >didn't specify mode/BW either and was 5 W ERP not EIRP. Anyway, >it's a good day for Canadians and those hoping to work them on 630. > >The CW beacon will be on again tonight and yours truly will certainly >consider requests for skeds! > >73 >Joe > >On Sun, 4 May 2014, Graham wrote: > >> Better late than never Joe, just in time for the next dip in >> solar >> activity as well ! >> >> No mention of modes and B/W in the sub clauses , other than the = >> usual >> 'no jam' ? >> >> 73, G, >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: >> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:11 AM >> To: >> Subject: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. >> >>> Hello Group, >>> >>> For those who didn't get the CW message on 477.7 kHz last night, I'm >>> happy to report that 472-479 kHz is now available to all Canadian >>> amateurs. Per the ITU WRC12 approval of 14 February 2012, we may >>> use 5 watts EIRP on the band but may not cause interference to >>> the primary users. For further info, please see the Industry Canada >>> web page, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf10759.html >>> which was published online last Thursday 1 May. >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe VO1NA >>> >>> >> >> > --- Ce courrier =C3=A9lectronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveilla= nt parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com