Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp160286igc; Mon, 5 May 2014 12:27:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.81.164 with SMTP id b4mr29370014wjy.2.1399318022969; Mon, 05 May 2014 12:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id en2si3524735wib.46.2014.05.05.12.27.02 for ; Mon, 05 May 2014 12:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WhO5D-0004mv-U7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 May 2014 19:57:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WhO5D-0004mm-FN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 May 2014 19:57:47 +0100 Received: from omr-d07.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.204]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WhO5B-00032t-Fx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 May 2014 19:57:46 +0100 Received: from mtaomg-aag01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-aag01.mx.aol.com [172.26.126.79]) by omr-d07.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 4C5A570236D6C for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 14:57:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mba02f.mail.aol.com (core-mba02.mail.aol.com [172.27.44.2]) by mtaomg-aag01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 1843538000082 for ; Mon, 5 May 2014 14:57:42 -0400 (EDT) References: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: JD X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AOL Webmail BASIC Received: from 67.239.127.149 by webmail-m155.sysops.aol.com (64.12.101.130) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 05 May 2014 14:57:42 -0400 Message-Id: <8D136AB06EF2C01-2CA8-21A27@webmail-m155.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [67.239.127.149] Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 14:57:42 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1399316262; bh=G7fzux2b/qpL7b/BkltND8lFUUsAtjpeetREVucBU1c=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uOxRSVegkix4Zx4/9leC29aSCJ3ahHxHEzFsOKTHhur9ayNAFQ8Dap3B2Vzv58oJa AJmIAaN7YrMTZT87S9XpYi8f4nsxjECFeg/tNEtwHH60VwcXj7ychYGnhgbtytLzlZ P5rEocsMxZpN392X6evrWSxL4Tj43oa5uqYZ4h08= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1a7e4f5367df260316 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: If the regulatory situation is anything like it is here, new frequency bands are a two-part process: allocation and rule implementation. Normally, the allocation has to take place first, and then the rules for the service in question are modified accordingly. I notice RBR-4 — Standards for the Operation of Radio Stations in the Amateur Radio Service was last revised in January and does not yet include the 630 meter allocation in Schedules I through III for Canadian amateurs. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.109.204 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (us66soft[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false If the regulatory situation is anything like it is here, new frequency bands are a two-part process: allocation and rule implementation. Normally, the allocation has to take place first, and then the rules for the service in question are modified accordingly. I notice RBR-4 =E2= =80=94 Standards for the Operation of Radio Stations in the Amateur Radio Service was last revised in January and does not yet include the 630 meter allocation in Schedules I through III for Canadian amateurs. Has Industry Canada issued a memo or circular specifically authorizing the band's use? 73 John -----Original Message----- From: jcraig To: rsgb_lf_group Sent: Sun, May 4, 2014 7:03 pm Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. Hi John, Good to hear from you again. Lets hope that we can get some activity in VE on this band. Perhaps we can try for a 2 way some day? So far, nothing about it from RAC..... 73 Joe On Sun, 4 May 2014, John Gibbs wrote: > Joe.. Thanks for being there with the latest info... wonder when=20 RAC will > notice :-) > > > 73 John / VE7BDQ > > > >