Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp84568igc; Wed, 7 May 2014 01:42:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.175.70 with SMTP id by6mr37161025wjc.3.1399452122197; Wed, 07 May 2014 01:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id wy8si6624472wjc.43.2014.05.07.01.42.01 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 01:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Whwya-0001ZO-0a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 09:13:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WhwyY-0001ZF-T2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 09:13:14 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.130] helo=cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WhwyV-0001oA-Ol for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 09:13:13 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 872F11280CD.A627D X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-2e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.34]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872F11280CD for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 10:13:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB2.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub2.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8624820041 for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 10:13:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::edaf:341f:90e:f70e]) by ICTS-S-HUB2.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::8559:ca7c:e195:e15d%26]) with mapi id 14.03.0169.001; Wed, 7 May 2014 10:13:06 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop ! Thread-Index: AQHPaUWlejCKHnKmMEGpVPLKNof+HZs0w8n9gAACGvE= Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 08:13:06 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FD3BAF9@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <1y7l2wj4hs78y2s60a2lxdjy.1399392558905@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <1y7l2wj4hs78y2s60a2lxdjy.1399392558905@email.android.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mimectl: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V14.3.123.2 x-originating-ip: [10.112.13.13] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.130 (rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: J'entend Joe aussi, mais il est très faible... Hi Christian, it's due to the time of the year. From november til february it should be no problem to work Joe in CW with moderate power (< 1W EIRP). During the winter 2009-2010 I could hear Joe almost every night with good signal and the US experimental stations (up to 20W ERP) were booming in too. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.58.240.130 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 14759bf2439a3bc6c6cfb00a36c7f220 Subject: RE: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop ! Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FD3BAF9ICTSSMBX1lunaku_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FD3BAF9ICTSSMBX1lunaku_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable J'entend Joe aussi, mais il est tr=E8s faible... Hi Christian, it's due to the time of the year. From november til february it should be n= o problem to work Joe in CW with moderate power (< 1W EIRP). During the win= ter 2009-2010 I could hear Joe almost every night with good signal and the = US experimental stations (up to 20W ERP) were booming in too. Let's hope that FCC allows 472kHz before the end of the year and there will= be plenty of VE/W stations to work next winter. 73, Rik ON7YD ________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens C. Groeger [aot.aot@gmx.de] Verzonden: dinsdag 6 mei 2014 18:09 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop ! Andr=E9, Peut-=EAtre tu m'as pas bien compris. Pourquoi faire du qrss si l'on pourrait faire CW? J'entend Joe aussi, mais il est tr=E8s faible... 73, Df5qg Christian Groeger Andr=E9 Guy=E9 schrieb: >Hi to all. > >Sure, it is not necessary to plan QRO for CW coming from Joe. > >Here I heard often the signal coming from Joe last winter, and also just >some last days around 0200 TU on QRSS with 559 good signal by ears ! > >I heard also some years ago CW QSO around 507 kHz between local US station= s, >and also between Finbar and VE / W stations. Did you remember about these >tests ? > >Here I have a QRP MF TX, so I cannot play that. But I am sure that any wes= t >EU station using 10 Watts ERP, can manage again this challenge, when the >conditions are good. > >But my ultimate and main question is : why some years ago there was some >activity on the old CW MF band from VE / W, and nothing now ? > >Andy. F6CNI. > >-----Message d'origine----- >From: C. Groeger >Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:38 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. > >Hi Joe! >5 watts eirp sounds very well! >Do you plan QRO for your CW? >I think then really two way CW should be possible over our distance! >73, df5qg > >Christian Groeger > >jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: > >>Hi Graham, >> >>I couldn't find antthing on modes or BW. The last LOA for the band >>didn't specify mode/BW either and was 5 W ERP not EIRP. Anyway, >>it's a good day for Canadians and those hoping to work them on 630. >> >>The CW beacon will be on again tonight and yours truly will certainly >>consider requests for skeds! >> >>73 >>Joe >> >>On Sun, 4 May 2014, Graham wrote: >> >>> Better late than never Joe, just in time for the next dip in >>> solar >>> activity as well ! >>> >>> No mention of modes and B/W in the sub clauses , other than the >>> usual >>> 'no jam' ? >>> >>> 73, G, >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: >>> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:11 AM >>> To: >>> Subject: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m. >>> >>>> Hello Group, >>>> >>>> For those who didn't get the CW message on 477.7 kHz last night, I'm >>>> happy to report that 472-479 kHz is now available to all Canadian >>>> amateurs. Per the ITU WRC12 approval of 14 February 2012, we may >>>> use 5 watts EIRP on the band but may not cause interference to >>>> the primary users. For further info, please see the Industry Canada >>>> web page, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf10759.html >>>> which was published online last Thursday 1 May. >>>> >>>> 73 >>>> Joe VO1NA >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > >--- >Ce courrier =E9lectronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant= parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. >http://www.avast.com > > --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FD3BAF9ICTSSMBX1lunaku_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

J'entend Joe aussi, mais il est tr=E8s faible...

 

Hi Christian,

 

it's due to the t= ime of the year. From november til february it should be no problem to work Joe in=  CW with modera= te power (< 1W EIRP). During the winter 2009-2010 I could=  hear Joe almost every night with good signal and the US experimental stations (up to = ;20W ERP) were = booming in too.

Let's hope that<= /a> FCC allows&= nbsp;472kHz before t= he end of the year and there will be plenty of VE/W stations to work next winter.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD

 

Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens C. Groeger [aot.aot@gmx.de]
Verzonden: dinsdag 6 mei 2014 18:09
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Onderwerp: Re: LF: TA CW QSO on<= /a> MF band is not<= /a> a scoop !

Andr=E9,
Peut-=EAtre tu = m'as pas bien compri= s.
Pourquoi faire du qrss si l'on pourrait faire CW?
J'entend Joe aussi, mais il est tr=E8s faible...
73, Df5qg

Christian Groeger

Andr=E9 Guy=E9 <andre.guye1@aliceadsl.fr> schrieb:

>Hi to all.
>
>Sure, it is = ;not necessary to pl= an QRO for = ;CW coming from Joe<= a target=3D"_blank">.
>
>Here I heard&nbs= p;often the signal c= oming from Joe = last winter, and also just
>some last days&n= bsp;around 0200 TU&n= bsp;on QRSS wit= h 559 good sign= al by ears !
>
>I heard also some years&nb= sp;ago CW QSO around 507 kHz b= etween local US stations,
>and also between Finbar and VE= / W stations. Did you remember about these
>tests ?
>
>Here I have a QRP MF TX, so I cannot play that. But I am sure = ;that any west
>EU station using 10 Watts ERP, can manage again thi= s challenge, when the
>conditions are good.<= br> >
>But my ulti= mate and main q= uestion is : why&nbs= p;some years ag= o there was some
>activity on the&= nbsp;old CW MF<= a target=3D"_blank"> band from VE / W, and nothing = now ?
>
>Andy. F6CNI.
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>From: C. Groeger
>Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:38 PM
>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m.
>
>Hi Joe!
>5 watts eirp sounds very well!
>Do you plan QRO=  for your C= W?
>I think then really two&nb= sp;way CW shoul= d be possible over our distance!<= br> >73, df5qg
>
>Christian Groeger
>
>jcraig@mun.ca schrieb= :
>
>>Hi Graham,
>>
>>I couldn't find antthing on modes or BW.  The last LOA for the band
>>didn't specify mode/BW either and was 5 W ERP not EIRP.  Anyway,
>>it's a good&= nbsp;day for Ca= nadians and those&nb= sp;hoping to work&nb= sp;them on 630.
>>
>>The CW beacon will be&= nbsp;on again t= onight and yours&nbs= p;truly will certainly
>>consider requests for skeds!
>>
>>73
>>Joe
>>
>>On Sun, 4 May 2014, Graham wrote:
>>
>>> Better late than  never Joe,  just  in time &= nbsp;for the  next<= /a>  dip  in
>>> solar
>>> activity as well !
>>>
>>> No  mention  of  = modes  and  B/W in the  sub  clauses , other  than the
>>> usual
>>> 'no jam' ?
>>>
>>> 73, G,
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: <jcraig= @mun.ca>
>>> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:11 AM >>> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org&= gt;
>>> Subject: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m.
>>>
>>>> Hello Group,
>>>>
>>>> For those who didn't get the CW message on 477.7 kHz last night, I'm
>>>> happy to report that 472-479= kHz is now available to all Canadian
>>>> amateurs.   Per the ITU WRC12 approval of 14 February 2012, we may
>>>> use 5 watts EIRP on the band but may not cause interference to
>>>> the primary users.  For further info,&nbs= p;please see the&nbs= p;Industry Canada
>>>> web page, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-= gst.nsf/eng/sf10759.html
>>>> which was published online last Thursday 1 = May.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> Joe VO1NA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>---
>Ce courrier =E9lectronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast= ! Antivirus est active.
>http://www.avast.co= m
>
>
--_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FD3BAF9ICTSSMBX1lunaku_--