Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.208.67 with SMTP id mc3csp98439igc; Mon, 12 May 2014 12:12:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.65.169 with SMTP id y9mr58782698pas.145.1399921927016; Mon, 12 May 2014 12:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id se7si6778788pbb.354.2014.05.12.12.12.05 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 12:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Wjval-0005dU-4d for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:08:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Wjvak-0005dL-DR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:08:50 +0100 Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com ([74.125.83.51]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1Wjvai-0000SB-TP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 20:08:49 +0100 Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e51so5012248eek.10 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 12:08:48 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SkEUj1rM1z9JxqqQnEjbF+MLcuxX0XiYODtjtY67fis=; b=ROHUrM1BzqYn76mOSTJC2ZOj7ACHKktW5CxBQ/BTMXVOTUqPtWMLV2yvTCSf8dppHX 9SPEOL08X1o1EbD7NaooyI7nlte4I9iqmQBGfn8k44bgVTfkLRX5a5/MbSDcXdwWDZtK J5bFzBucR4Qxdut1PA5MW46n2Ntf4tS2DcN3T38ZGQfcOysEeUr9QVQT2oFWteOj7ONI zPEmzkPFujz3vjAHCsl43iHCW9dnb/8Pwc+VmkbNH14QrdLXYbDSgXVpA459Z+0mzAX7 eYT+zqVYkpwV0YHaPtcjpkk/+ozgkViXl5s9qyH0K36dxUqepWFLMOv5zCPdQwfTL7/t 8EMw== X-Received: by 10.15.54.6 with SMTP id s6mr34575904eew.4.1399921727960; Mon, 12 May 2014 12:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s46sm34814080ees.3.2014.05.12.12.08.46 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 May 2014 12:08:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <53711C3E.4040207@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 21:08:46 +0200 From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <536F1A51.3060806@abelian.org> <078901cf6d1b$4179a730$c46cf590$@comcast.net> <5370FABB.8020500@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <5370FABB.8020500@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, Am 12.05.2014 18:45, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > The signal from Markus is perfect for these tests - very stable, > and also quite weak at this range - ideal for tests of coherent > modulation with strong FEC. Would the stability of my signal reach the requirements as well? So far i didn't try Markus' new technique to "compensate" phase glitches but it may be worth a try. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: Re: VLF: Coherent BPSK at 8270 from DF6NM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, Am 12.05.2014 18:45, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > The signal from Markus is perfect for these tests - very stable, > and also quite weak at this range - ideal for tests of coherent > modulation with strong FEC. Would the stability of my signal reach the requirements as well? So far i didn't try Markus' new technique to "compensate" phase glitches but it may be worth a try. 73, Stefan