Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp91999igc; Wed, 7 May 2014 03:42:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.36.66 with SMTP id o2mr7189023wij.40.1399459321340; Wed, 07 May 2014 03:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gi11si5572455wic.92.2014.05.07.03.42.00 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 03:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Whywi-00028G-BN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 11:19:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Whywh-000287-Nd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 11:19:27 +0100 Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1Whywf-0002f6-QK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 11:19:26 +0100 Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id d17so559535eek.16 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 03:19:24 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=ggTkeg5r9WOhUrYda2P3WJjxS9KZoDusDWepSOJu0+0=; b=r9BW+8g9VongyKaOEj0i+N3t32+KEjBSBocuN9UGwfvH9zn39XXUF8tgsbXStRMzVc oaRYyUmdxZNqRKFJoy70r6NiEYVokLn4CGfwtIBSPs9b+4apUQnnNyuFGonqcKTD2QaD C9zTP6XTaw1VBJ/ttaHfiw9R8FuHn6VmuUBynfJZk6E/PAbkiEJHhNG+4maw5I7hBKfY 2+o0OKHsDGrLZBaE81TtqPVMgogenScRDTCZ3ZbkMKwD/0iDF1reZSpuIp7tx5b/qnDD FFpPwB0jqgyVPAqwrBq106nkuOvJrgP7mopeDGP7OE+H01fHvtYZHAa9zjDbpOFpYGaO Z7lg== X-Received: by 10.14.98.69 with SMTP id u45mr14810762eef.81.1399457964606; Wed, 07 May 2014 03:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bc51sm45366432eeb.22.2014.05.07.03.19.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 07 May 2014 03:19:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <536A08AA.8040902@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 12:19:22 +0200 From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <53694602.30205@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <53694602.30205@xs4all.nl> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Aaaaaah so that was QRO, not QRP, right? Or what was the TX power, rather 5W or rather 500W? And what about Bob, 5W or 500W? Just to make things clear regarding "QRO is not necessary". Was it a longer QSO with some content or just "RRRRR 73 73 73 didididadidaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1273381c241b4bc851b7e848e0897dc9 Subject: Re: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070604070001000400050201" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070604070001000400050201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Aaaaaah so that was QRO, not QRP, right? Or what was the TX power, rather 5W or rather 500W? And what about Bob, 5W or 500W? Just to make things clear regarding "QRO is not necessary". Was it a longer QSO with some content or just "RRRRR 73 73 73 didididadidaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" :-) 73, Stefan Am 06.05.2014 22:28, schrieb Albert: > All fyi, > > I had a CW QSO on 502 kHz with Bob WE2XGR/6 on Feb 9 2010, 04:00 UTC > at that time the DX record on CW. On my website (in plane Dutch) a > copy of the QSL card and an audio file of the first part of the QSO > including a restart of my keyer. My output during the QSO was abt, 5 W > erp. > > http://www.pa0a.com/500-khz/ > > (see: EERSTE QSO NEDERLAND etc.) for the audio file click left on QSO > WE2XGR-6 v3 > > 73, Albert PA0A > > > > > > Warren Ziegler schreef op 6-5-2014 16:57: >> Andy, >> >> Some years ago Bob W2ZM using the experimental call WE2XGR/6 >> worked Finbar EI0CF on CW and also ssb (Bob ran ssb, Finbar ran CW). >> Somewhere I have a .wav file from Finbar with his reception of >> Bob's ssb signal. >> I know that there have been other T/A contacts but I don't recall all >> the details. >> >> 73 Warren K2ORS >> >> >> >> >> > --------------070604070001000400050201 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi,

Aaaaaah so that was QRO, not QRP, right? Or what was the TX power, rather 5W or rather 500W?
And what about Bob, 5W or 500W?
Just to make things clear regarding "QRO is not necessary".
Was it a longer QSO with some content or just "RRRRR 73 73 73 didididadidaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" :-)

73, Stefan



Am 06.05.2014 22:28, schrieb Albert:
All fyi,

I had a CW QSO on 502 kHz with Bob WE2XGR/6 on Feb 9 2010,  04:00 UTC at that time the DX record on CW. On my website (in plane Dutch) a copy of the QSL card and an audio file of the first part of the QSO including a restart of my keyer. My output during the QSO was abt, 5 W erp.

 http://www.pa0a.com/500-khz/

(see: EERSTE QSO NEDERLAND etc.)  for the audio file click left on QSO WE2XGR-6 v3

73, Albert PA0A





Warren Ziegler schreef op 6-5-2014 16:57:
Andy,

   Some years ago Bob W2ZM using the experimental call WE2XGR/6 worked Finbar EI0CF on CW and also ssb (Bob ran ssb, Finbar ran CW).  
    Somewhere I have a .wav file from Finbar with his reception of Bob's ssb signal.
I know that there have been other T/A contacts but I don't recall all the details.

73 Warren K2ORS






--------------070604070001000400050201--