Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <53692CBD.6000301@freenet.de>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 20:41:01 +0200
From: wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <y00tv5w5wsv6u0lg3hpqn7yp.1399383376349@email.android.com> <BF9D0E06875A41149D27FD4426DD48AD@F6CNI>
In-Reply-To: <BF9D0E06875A41149D27FD4426DD48AD@F6CNI>
Subject: Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop !
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Especially when we consider that 1 W ERP is the legal limit in most 
parts of EU...

  :o)

73,
   Wolf .

Am 06.05.2014 16:01, schrieb André Guyé:
> Hi to all.
>
> Sure, it is not necessary to plan QRO for CW coming from Joe.
>
> Here I heard often the signal coming from Joe last winter, and also 
> just some last days around 0200 TU on QRSS with 559 good signal by ears !
>
> I heard also some years ago CW QSO around 507 kHz between local US 
> stations, and also between Finbar and VE / W stations. Did you 
> remember about these tests ?
>
> Here I have a QRP MF TX, so I cannot play that. But I am sure that any 
> west EU station using 10 Watts ERP, can manage again this challenge, 
> when the conditions are good.
>
> But my ultimate and main question is : why some years ago there was 
> some activity on the old CW MF band from VE / W, and nothing now ?
>
> Andy. F6CNI.
>
> -----Message d'origine----- From: C. Groeger
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:38 PM
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m.
>
> Hi Joe!
> 5 watts eirp sounds very well!
> Do you plan QRO for your CW?
> I think then really two way CW should be possible over our distance!
> 73, df5qg
>
> Christian Groeger
>
> jcraig@mun.ca schrieb:
>
>> Hi Graham,
>>
>> I couldn't find antthing on modes or BW.  The last LOA for the band
>> didn't specify mode/BW either and was 5 W ERP not EIRP.  Anyway,
>> it's a good day for Canadians and those hoping to work them on 630.
>>
>> The CW beacon will be on again tonight and yours truly will certainly
>> consider requests for skeds!
>>
>> 73
>> Joe
>>
>> On Sun, 4 May 2014, Graham wrote:
>>
>>> Better late than  never Joe,  just  in time  for the  next  dip  in 
>>> solar
>>> activity as well !
>>>
>>> No  mention  of  modes  and  B/W in the  sub  clauses , other than 
>>> the usual
>>> 'no jam' ?
>>>
>>> 73, G,
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: <jcraig@mun.ca>
>>> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:11 AM
>>> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>>> Subject: LF: Canada's newest amateur band - 630m.
>>>
>>>> Hello Group,
>>>>
>>>> For those who didn't get the CW message on 477.7 kHz last night, I'm
>>>> happy to report that 472-479 kHz is now available to all Canadian
>>>> amateurs.   Per the ITU WRC12 approval of 14 February 2012, we may
>>>> use 5 watts EIRP on the band but may not cause interference to
>>>> the primary users.  For further info, please see the Industry Canada
>>>> web page, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf10759.html
>>>> which was published online last Thursday 1 May.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> Joe VO1NA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel 
> malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>