Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp124750igc; Wed, 7 May 2014 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.72.205 with SMTP id f13mr8933641wiv.45.1399484519374; Wed, 07 May 2014 10:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gi15si7177236wjc.234.2014.05.07.10.41.58 for ; Wed, 07 May 2014 10:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@comcast.net; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Wi5RQ-000465-3A for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 18:15:36 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Wi5RP-00045w-Gx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 18:15:35 +0100 Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.227]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Wi5RM-0005O5-R3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 May 2014 18:15:34 +0100 Received: from omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id z49b1n0010cZkys5C5FVpC; Wed, 07 May 2014 17:15:29 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([71.234.119.9]) by omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id z5FV1n00B0CFS1j3W5FVeZ; Wed, 07 May 2014 17:15:29 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK Message-ID: <009701cf6a17$f229c710$6d01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <53694602.30205@xs4all.nl> <536A08AA.8040902@gmail.com> <536A103F.6070801@xs4all.nl> <002001cf69f0$8a7d03b0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 13:15:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1399482929; bh=Nne3m40YtvcqlfJND1bJbdZr8/cwYz4d2X9kNWzIG7A=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=EbXdQTOWRuA+UEcMqVLcesLpYT5iRHTR3mbAWOSYN2lI2XvYWsh6lD/W4maBbWWI/ QrFr0vP09ZKOh7BtlyJae1txFq7lAJlyUKpJJG6sDDwM2R0VcxI2o9/vrbv6gsJaB4 D4Iz2NH4gLwNWdCtqSr06tRU0ZeDDr7X58+j8yGXUj2R2VV3EixzS6Zn1+J2/914+n saeJ7KnLcOG1LC+aXSVaIyxtVmWXlnFCBPwy0PrJVzBfOZUJ01aCEnAsqr/9yxhQP9 OB4y/KnE7Sgzf+ud5x2Z2pwYJsIXAObAYWXf1fNJY+IDLkCXNbiUxOW0sM8whiKa2B K2qEhZ6T2bRnQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Joe Wow ... time flies. WE2XGR/2 <> GI4DPE 11/14/2007 0100Z. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.227 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 34d483c57c7a6bf26c25db3c8765d5fc Subject: Re: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Joe Wow ... time flies. WE2XGR/2 <> GI4DPE 11/14/2007 0100Z. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:30 AM Subject: Re: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop > Hi Jay, > > I remember that one, congrats, but I don't recall the date. I'd like to > make a summary of TA on 600/630m. > > date time freq mode east | west > --------------------------------------------------------- > ? 500? CW EI0CF 559 20m T | WE2XGR/2 559 400W 90' top loaded tower > SSB EI0C ? 20m T | WE2XGR/6 > 9 2 10 0400 502 CW PA0A 400W 5W ERP | WE2XGR/6 > > Etc. > > Thanks > Joe VO1NA > > On Wed, 7 May 2014, jrusgrove@comcast.net wrote: > >> WE2XGR/2 and Finbar made the first, and several subsequent W <> EU CW QSOs >> on MF. Transmitting >> conditions at WE2XGR/2: 400 watts transmitter power to 90' top loaded >> vertical. The QSO were >> relatively short but included a small amount of information besides 559 73 >> sk. >> >> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: Albert >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 6:51 AM >> Subject: Re: CW & SSB T/A !(was Re: LF: TA CW QSO on MF band is not a scoop >> >> >> Stefan, >> >> If you take a better look at Bob's QSL card (click to enlarge) you see 2000W >> tx power. I used abt >> 400W to get the 5 W erp radiated by the antenna. If you listen to the signal >> of Bob you will realize >> that only RRRRR etc was not necessary. >> You are right abt using QRP on these bands, a QRO tx is very useful to get >> out of the garden. If >> you consider the erp. we are actually working QRP on these low bands. >> >> 73, Albert >> >> >> >> >> >> DK7FC schreef op 7-5-2014 12:19: >> >> Hi, >> >> Aaaaaah so that was QRO, not QRP, right? Or what was the TX power, rather 5W >> or rather 500W? >> And what about Bob, 5W or 500W? >> Just to make things clear regarding "QRO is not necessary". >> Was it a longer QSO with some content or just "RRRRR 73 73 73 >> didididadidaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> >> Am 06.05.2014 22:28, schrieb Albert: >> All fyi, >> >> I had a CW QSO on 502 kHz with Bob WE2XGR/6 on Feb 9 2010, 04:00 UTC at that >> time the DX record on >> CW. On my website (in plane Dutch) a copy of the QSL card and an audio file >> of the first part of the >> QSO including a restart of my keyer. My output during the QSO was abt, 5 W >> erp. >> >> http://www.pa0a.com/500-khz/ >> >> (see: EERSTE QSO NEDERLAND etc.) for the audio file click left on QSO >> WE2XGR-6 v3 >> >> 73, Albert PA0A >> >> >> >> >> >> Warren Ziegler schreef op 6-5-2014 16:57: >> >> Andy, >> >> >> Some years ago Bob W2ZM using the experimental call WE2XGR/6 worked Finbar >> EI0CF on CW and also >> ssb (Bob ran ssb, Finbar ran CW). >> Somewhere I have a .wav file from Finbar with his reception of Bob's ssb >> signal. >> I know that there have been other T/A contacts but I don't recall all the >> details. >> >> >> 73 Warren K2ORS >> >> >> >