Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp146969igc; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:03:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.205.96.138 with SMTP id cg10mr269190bkc.111.1396890179741; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ec18si861316bkb.200.2014.04.07.10.02.59 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WXCvz-0004CK-IB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 18:02:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WXCvy-0004Bz-PR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 18:02:10 +0100 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WXCvx-0000j5-5p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 18:02:09 +0100 Received: from AGB ([95.145.215.205]) by mwinf5d42 with ME id n5251n00Y4SUDYF03525Gx; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 19:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <1396880166.33046.YahooMailBasic@web173005.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1396880166.33046.YahooMailBasic@web173005.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 18:02:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Or is the acoustic PING encoded The recovery sonic beacons send only a pulse flight boxes are not the only things that have locator beacons , other 'things' that occasionally are lost by accident or design also have ping'ers that work round this frequency , the surfacing radio boys have encoding etc [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 4d97240a623a26620214cd27feaa9f71 Subject: Re: LF: SpecLab helps plane hunt Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Or is the acoustic PING encoded The recovery sonic beacons send only a pulse flight boxes are not the only things that have locator beacons , other 'things' that occasionally are lost by accident or design also have ping'ers that work round this frequency , the surfacing radio boys have encoding etc lower freq would travel better , but be more vague as to location of the source , no one has mentioned the Sub (s ?) for a while ? G, -------------------------------------------------- From: "M0FMT" Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 3:16 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: SpecLab helps plane hunt > Hi all > > If their kit is that shaky do > they understand that EM "breakthrough" into the > long trailing antenna like cables from the sensors at 37.5 > kHz is possible? i.e. Powerful VLF TX operating in that > frequency range because of its sea penetrating properties > for very purpose of communicating with submerged Naval > Submarines. Or is the acoustic PING encoded to avoid this > confusion? > > 73 es GL Pete > M0FMT IO91UX > > -------------------------------------------- > On Mon, 7/4/14, Mike Dennison > wrote: > > Subject: LF: SpecLab helps > plane hunt > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, > rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > Date: Monday, 7 April, 2014, 14:15 > > I have been amazed at the > low tech > methods apparently being used in > > the hunt for the 'pings' from the > black box of the missing > Malaysian > plane. > > But > today the BBC lunchtime news showed the Ocean Shield > search ship > using > DL4YHF's Spectrum Laboratory, presumably with a 96kHz > soundcard > as its input - > exactly the kit used for the recent amateur > > radio > transatlantic tests on 29kHz. > > Well done, Wolf. Your > excellent software may help solve this > > mystery. > > de Mike, > G3XDV > > >