Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
From: Rik Strobbe <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Thread-Topic: LF: SpecLab helps plane hunt
Thread-Index: AQHPUmvqCHorkTFK0kKFqV7ZhUkOT5sGKkGAgAAoKzc=
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 16:11:02 +0000
Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FCFE785@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be>
References: <1396880166.33046.YahooMailBasic@web173005.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>,<5342C7F3.9060101@freenet.de>
In-Reply-To: <5342C7F3.9060101@freenet.de>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: nl-BE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: LF: SpecLab helps plane hunt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Hi Wolf,

not only hams know that your software is outstanding.
Although I wouldn't be surprised if at least one of the specialist on board=
 of the Ocean Shield is a ham.

73, Rik  ON7YD


________________________________________
Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
] namens wolf_dl4yhf [dl4yhf@freenet.de]
Verzonden: maandag 7 april 2014 17:44
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Onderwerp: Re: LF: SpecLab helps plane hunt

Hi Pete, Mike, Alan, and all,

I was also sceptic about the first "detection" (by the Malaysian or was
it a Chinese search vessel).

But to me, the spectrograms taken by the US team aboard Ocean Shield is
convincing.

The screenshot at ABC is a bit blurred but one can nicely see the
"bipp-bipp-bipp-..." periodic ultrasonic bursts (aka "pings"), just as
they should look like:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-07/ocean-shield-detects-possible-mh370-b=
lack-box-signal/5372616

It's not just a wobbly carrier that comes and goes. In slow-CW-terms, it
would be an "outstanding signal". The signal is picked up by a towfish
pulled on a long cable, to get away from the QRM (vessel) as far as
possible.

Now keeping fingers crossed that the batteries last a bit longer than
specified. The experts say the pinger's battery usually degrades slowly,
instead of "going QRT" abruptly.

73,
    Wolf  DL4YHF .


Am 07.04.2014 16:16, schrieb M0FMT:
>   Hi all
>
>   If their kit is that shaky do
>   they understand that EM "breakthrough" into the
>   long trailing  antenna like cables from the sensors at 37.5
>   kHz is possible?  i.e. Powerful VLF TX operating in that
>   frequency range because of its sea penetrating properties
>   for very purpose of communicating with submerged Naval
>   Submarines. Or is the acoustic PING encoded to avoid this
>   confusion?
>
>   73 es GL Pete
>   M0FMT IO91UX
>
>   --------------------------------------------
>   On Mon, 7/4/14, Mike Dennison <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com>
>   wrote:
>
>    Subject: LF: SpecLab helps
>   plane hunt
>    To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org,
>   rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
>    Date: Monday, 7 April, 2014, 14:15
>
>    I have been amazed at the
>   low tech
>    methods apparently being used in
>
>    the hunt for the 'pings' from the
>   black box of the missing
>    Malaysian
>    plane.
>
>    But
>   today the BBC lunchtime news showed the Ocean Shield
>    search ship
>    using
>   DL4YHF's Spectrum Laboratory, presumably with a 96kHz
>    soundcard
>    as its input -
>   exactly the kit used for the recent amateur
>
>   radio
>    transatlantic tests on 29kHz.
>
>    Well done, Wolf. Your
>   excellent software may help solve this
>
>   mystery.
>
>    de Mike,
>   G3XDV
>
>
>
>
>=