Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp46610igc; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 22:07:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.118.198 with SMTP id ko6mr12485372lbb.6.1398575256087; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 22:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pr4si8077506lbc.51.2014.04.26.22.07.34 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2014 22:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WeHHY-00030f-6U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 06:05:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WeHHX-00030W-IH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 06:05:39 +0100 Received: from smtp2.virginbroadband.com.au ([123.200.191.52] helo=smtp.virginbroadband.com.au) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WeHHU-00039H-70 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 06:05:38 +0100 Received: from [123.200.236.228] (unknown [123.200.236.228]) by smtp.virginbroadband.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BE9900875 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 15:05:25 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <535C9006.5070404@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 15:05:10 +1000 From: edgar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 123.200.191.52 (smtp2.virginbroadband.com.au) used invalid HELO/EHLO smtp.virginbroadband.com.au - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Possibly a silly question but, Is it possible to detect low frequency electromagnetic waves with Fluxgate or Proton Magnetometer? e.g. waves with frequency of 8 kHz to 29 kHz? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [123.200.191.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: e4383209d2ccb9552700d53c0b540538 Subject: LF: Magnetometers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Possibly a silly question but, Is it possible to detect low frequency electromagnetic waves with Fluxgate or Proton Magnetometer? e.g. waves with frequency of 8 kHz to 29 kHz? Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania.