Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp102110igc; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:57:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.20.65 with SMTP id l1mr30604098wje.39.1397444268423; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id em8si3904697wib.39.2014.04.13.19.57.47 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WZWjr-00073T-34 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 03:35:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WZWjq-00073K-H6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 03:35:14 +0100 Received: from mail-qa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.216.54]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WZWjo-0003Cz-W4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 03:35:13 +0100 Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id w8so7509799qac.13 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:35:11 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qxyFDmAGLTurBBAlkH3Jvv0q5WH0JzgMivJEReuPzoA=; b=wqC1wDv0O42To0aDtNeeXRym5oXORqfj2bmfoPrvF/YTy5nnoyH64L7zHBpN6suQ69 N841WcUzOj1EBheAvb3HGwiUva45prtEeIe7kF3TWtgimT6FlKQM+H8jeT4lHejETe48 Slrd+U3eI55TI5N6zdfWBV1YVrC3n3BIOcGjCZHBlXpKOj4bB+hdKVwBUM5yiw9vSR4g AkRFujZpIQ7RMGlR+TV7WJTUmfdpAXsqsdTD9+J1LNxyybgzhko968jPfLzNm77lLZvw yKZ3AJOcc+LkIEd48GrArvYlHl2NbHjtkje625/xEAGQ3lJm2IcF70C3UmGgU8LUlh5r KeQA== X-Received: by 10.140.21.164 with SMTP id 33mr1334qgl.97.1397442910890; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (h111.158.82.166.dynamic.ip.windstream.net. [166.82.158.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b5sm28734334qar.25.2014.04.13.19.35.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <534B4934.8010209@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 22:34:28 -0400 From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX User-Agent: Messenger 9.0a1 (Windows/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <53493E64.5090708@gmail.com> <53499588.3000002@gmail.com> <4A845D55AC7B43CAAF854BD5F4FE616B@White> <53499AD4.3080405@gmail.com> <776DDB1AA79E4AAD876EB1C13CF23D5E@White> <534B3D08.1060204@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <534B3D08.1060204@charter.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: John Andrews wrote: > Stefan's signal showed up later tonight, around 0045Z, and is really > nice copy at 0130Z. Last night, I had earlier copy, around 0015Z, but > the signal was lost in the QRN by 0100. Not a trace here. QRN arrived early. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.216.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dexter.mc[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7b4dbd93955117b98f3a6ac4d7602f88 Subject: Re: LF: 136 kHz TA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false John Andrews wrote: > Stefan's signal showed up later tonight, around 0045Z, and is really > nice copy at 0130Z. Last night, I had earlier copy, around 0015Z, but > the signal was lost in the QRN by 0100. Not a trace here. QRN arrived early. Dex