Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp87626igc; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 12:46:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.36.101 with SMTP id p5mr6671251wij.8.1397418408803; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 12:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m5si3796374wib.26.2014.04.13.12.46.48 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 12:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WZQ66-0003jX-UO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 20:29:46 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WZQ66-0003jO-DY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 20:29:46 +0100 Received: from omr-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.200]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WZQ64-0002Ie-7d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 20:29:45 +0100 Received: from mtaout-mab01.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mab01.mx.aol.com [172.26.249.81]) by omr-d03.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id DC5BF70000086 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:29:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from White (95-91-237-52-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.52]) by mtaout-mab01.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 9DCB3380000B3 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:29:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1349E31E706A4D1CA926ABABF714699C@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <95AB416689124454ADC6D2497258EAEF@White> <534ADB74.2080803@freenet.de> <1702E3AA5AAF4C999DFE49D3977ED95F@White> <534AE2BA.1080505@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:29:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1397417381; bh=aS8eK+WkujlpWQ4ca3KlHyUz16By6F7UufR0BAHLd0I=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eW1gmXRS+lWTGyx1iam+0jshkibQ2WZG9+wVm5kltNLg+BfVr2CJtoRC4Spqz7Gf/ 4JrBrI5QB+CuujhkGMnafQ0FOFRGN/X3qd8EZ4l/Or5YLunVjqfEeJ1S/CM7mcpraW yn5DMng9O4DXViQt+n1xju+/F4aDMhWrDqzmBwnU= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1af951534ae5a24048 X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.52 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Wolf, thanks very much for the fine experiment and the report - glad that you successfully picked up the transmission on that attic dipole! So the mode can't be so bad ;-) Grumpelmumpf - may you hear only pleasant noises from your receiver, from now on ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.109.200 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: ee37f4b261e58bbaf6a18fc5319c092e Subject: Re: LF: WSQ 137.0 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01CF575F.7AB73390" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CF575F.7AB73390 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wolf, thanks very much for the fine experiment and the report - glad = that you successfully picked up the transmission on that attic dipole! = So the mode can't be so bad ;-) Grumpelmumpf - may you hear only pleasant noises from your receiver, = from now on ;-) Best 73, Markus From: wolf_dl4yhf=20 Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:17 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: WSQ 137.0 kHz The wobbly drifting QRM went away (receiving with the local antenna, = attic dipole) and now the automatic decoder also works aas it should: ... Signal not audible here, in the 'Grumpelmumpf' (geek speak for = unpleasant noise from a receiver, hi). 73, Wolf . Am 13.04.2014 20:59, schrieb Markus Vester: Wolf, continuing to send short "CQ"s every three or five minutes or so. Yes = I'd be interested to know if you can pick it up... Running your software version WSQ2 (April 12), worked UFB right from = start! 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: wolf_dl4yhf=20 Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 8:46 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: WSQ 137.0 kHz Hi Markus, On LF, 'receive-only' mode since a couple of years, but it may be an = interesting test. I can switch the remote RX to LF, but I think the IC706 is quite deaf = on LF without the variometer.. 73, Wolf . Am 13.04.2014 19:59, schrieb Markus Vester: Just trying Wolf's latest version of WSQ above 137.0 kHz - anyone = for a QSO? Markus (DF6NM) ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CF575F.7AB73390 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wolf, thanks very much for the fine = experiment and=20 the report - glad that you successfully picked up the = transmission on=20 that attic dipole! So the mode can't be so bad ;-)
 
Grumpelmumpf - may you hear = only pleasant=20 noises from your receiver, from now on ;-)
 
Best 73,
Markus

Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:17 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: LF: WSQ 137.0 kHz

The wobbly drifting QRM went away = (receiving with the=20 local antenna, attic dipole) and now the automatic decoder also works = aas it=20 should:

...

Signal not = audible=20 here, in the 'Grumpelmumpf' (geek speak for unpleasant noise from a = receiver,=20 hi).

73,
  Wolf .



Am 13.04.2014 20:59, = schrieb=20 Markus Vester:
Wolf,
 
continuing to send short "CQ"s every = three or=20 five minutes or so. Yes I'd be interested to know if you = can pick it=20 up...
 
Running your software version = WSQ2 (April=20 12), worked UFB right from start!
 
73, Markus (DF6NM)
 
 

Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WSQ 137.0 kHz

Hi Markus,

On LF, 'receive-only' = mode since=20 a couple of years, but it may be an interesting test.

I can = switch the=20 remote RX to LF, but I think the IC706 is quite deaf on LF without the = variometer..

73,
  Wolf .

Am 13.04.2014 19:59, = schrieb=20 Markus Vester:
Just trying Wolf's = latest version of WSQ=20 above 137.0 kHz - anyone for a QSO?
 
Markus (DF6NM)
 


------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CF575F.7AB73390--