Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.203.68 with SMTP id ko4csp236105igc; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:58:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.8.66 with SMTP id di2mr17861221wid.43.1395701911243; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id iy12si2632335wic.81.2014.03.24.15.58.30 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WSDHG-00081m-Bs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:23:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WSDHF-00081d-UV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:23:29 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WSDHE-0006to-0I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:23:28 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s2OMNQCP021788 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:53:26 -0230 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:53:26 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: _RSGB_LF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Lubos, Please do join in! 73 Joe [...] Content analysis details: (-1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.153.232.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 622b0ca3461797caf37867321c193763 Subject: RE: LF: VO1NA QRSS10 on 477.7 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Lubos, Please do join in! 73 Joe On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Lubos wrote: > Hello Joe and Christian!I am going to be on 630m as well. My favourite frq is 472.7kHz. Can I join you? > Lubos, OK2BVG, JN88KS > ************************************************************************** > >> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:17:49 -0230 >> From: jcraig@mun.ca >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA QRSS10 on 477.7 kHz >> >> Hi Christian, >> >> Yes, let's try for a real CW QSO tonight. Will call 0000 utc and >> on the half hours until 0200. Will listen 472.5 kHz if that's OK >> with you. >> >> We are having a blizzard so experimentation with the antenna >> is out for today. The TX might be convinced to give another 3 dB. >> Let's hope that a fried FET is not in the future! >> >> >> 73 >> Joe VO1NA >> >> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, C. Groeger wrote: >> >>> Hi Joe, >> Can you QRO a bit for a real CW QSO? >> You told me last time, you heard me and I heard you as well... >> 73, df5qg >> >> Christian Groeger >> >> jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: >> >>> Many thanks for the reply to my calls. Your signals were also audible at >>> times. BIA could be heard before our QSO and WD2SXH/7 was about 559 near >>> 476 kHz towards the end. Thank-you for staying up so late to make it all >>> happen! TX here 50 watts, ERP about 1 watt. >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe VO1NA >>> >>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Joe, >>>> >>>> Many thanks also... just now, at the 'final dit', your signal is audible >>>> again: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> SNR in QRSS10 bandwidth (approx. 0.1 Hz) : over 30 dB ! >>>> >>>> 73 and gn, >>>> Wolf DL4YHF >>>> JO42FD >>>> 100 W, inv. L with 60 meter total wire length, horizontal part approx 11 >>>> meters above ground. >>>> ..zzz.. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 22.03.2014 13:19, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>>>> >>>>> Hello Wolf, >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks for the details of your reception. Sending audible sigs to DL >>>>> was very gratifing. There is some room to improve the ERP >>>>> and I look forward to experimenting with this. >>>>> >>>>> 73 and thanks again >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Greetings all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Nice signal from Joe throughout the night, strongest around 04:00 UTC >>>>>> here, but 'ever-present' between start and sunrise. >>>>>> Multi-strip spectrogram covering the strongest part (which was audible >>>>>> during the peaks at 03:45 UTC): >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/mf/VO1NA_2014_03_22__04UTC.jpg >>>>>> >>>>>> The signal began to drop at 05:00 UTC, which is in the upper right corner >>>>>> of the screenshot. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the test Joe. Hope to meet you in a QSO mode one day, for me >>>>>> JT9-1 appears manageable... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 73, >>>>>> Wolf DL4YHF >>>>>> JO42RX >>>>>> RX: old IC-706 on 60 meter wire antenna resonated at 475 kHz, >>>>>> preselector/preamp *off* . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >