Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp19410igc; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 03:57:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.7.130 with SMTP id j2mr2043007wia.25.1394881069407; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 03:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gu8si1130256wib.0.2014.03.15.03.57.48 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 03:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WOlW7-0003Zu-Af for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:08:35 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WOlW6-0003Zl-Vi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:08:34 +0000 Received: from nina.ucs.mun.ca ([134.153.232.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WOlW4-0008BF-O9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:08:33 +0000 Received: from plato.ucs.mun.ca (plato.ucs.mun.ca [134.153.232.153]) by nina.ucs.mun.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s2FA8QZk006100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 07:38:28 -0230 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 07:38:26 -0230 (NDT) From: jcraig@mun.ca X-X-Sender: jcraig@plato.ucs.mun.ca To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Christian, Yes, again tonight. Your sigs were nil to 339 during your QSO with Finbar. 73 Joe VO1NA [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.153.232.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c1f72e5acb1277e013f90c915ad7ad68 Subject: Re: LF: Beacon 477.7 kHz Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Christian, Yes, again tonight. Your sigs were nil to 339 during your QSO with Finbar. 73 Joe VO1NA On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, C. Groeger wrote: > Hi Joe, Is your beacon also active on Sunday? Was not qrv in the night but heard you recently in QSO with Finbar 229. 73, df5qg Christian Groeger jcraig@mun.ca schrieb: >Dear Group, > >12 WPM CW starting 0000 utc 15 March. > >Reports welcomed! > >73 >Joe VO1NA >