Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp14021igc; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 12:35:44 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.205.239 with SMTP id lj15mr3518777wic.22.1394310943786; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 12:35:43 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id uu2si14678842wjc.15.2014.03.08.12.35.43 for ; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 12:35:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WMNkw-0007EF-Qy for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:22:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WMNkw-0007E6-B6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:22:02 +0000 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WMNku-0006q9-3V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:22:01 +0000 Received: from AGB ([95.145.213.80]) by mwinf5d33 with ME id b8My1n00K1keauP038Mykx; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:21:59 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <2662DF5AA7FA416CBB09CDB90BBFF7B1@White> <016101cf39df$4f4c89a0$ede59ce0$@comcast.net> <01dc01cf3a3f$86997bb0$93cc7310$@comcast.net> <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <025101cf3a52$e0925750$a1b705f0$@comcast.net> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <531A506E.9040103@abelian.org> <531A5C19.9060209@abelian.org> <02ba01cf3aa3$debaad50$9c3007f0$@comcast.net> <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org> <850A470A5B9F4483BED8B49D4791044A@White> <531B1D0C.3070208@abelian.org> <531B2478.70500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <531B796A.9000906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <531B796A.9000906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 20:21:58 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Surely the dynamic range is defined by the a/d in the sound card ...... ? the wi-fi link should only mimic the USb link ? its only in compression modes that all sorts of adjacent tones and dynamic range are limited ? a wave file is raw data ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: c8ff00257edaad8e124ab9389da9609a Subject: Re: LF: Microphone via WLAN (WiFi) ? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Surely the dynamic range is defined by the a/d in the sound card ...... ? the wi-fi link should only mimic the USb link ? its only in compression modes that all sorts of adjacent tones and dynamic range are limited ? a wave file is raw data ? PC in the link ....... dont know , but if the wi-fi simply extended the USB distance , then , would not the driver be at the end of the link ? as in the post ? G, -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Schäfer" Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 8:11 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Microphone via WLAN (WiFi) ? > Hello Mauro, Clemens, Graham, > > Your examples are in principle what i need but in these systems, the > dynamic range is much to low, maybe 40...50 dB. Some years ago i played > arround with some Bluetooth headset, which has a microphone input of > course. But the results were very poor. > > Also, the backgound noise reduction is an unwanted feature here, as well > as an AGC. > > I think, i the todays world, it should be "easy" to combine a SMD ADC > (those from the cheap soundcards) with a SMD WLAN IC (those from the cheap > USB WLAN adapters, giving some 10 mW to some 100 mW output power). But i > don't know anything about the communication between these 2 ICs, > protocols, configuration, etc. etc. > > > Am 08.03.2014 16:21, schrieb Graham: >> [...] >> MIC <> USB SOUND CARD <> USB/WIFI ~~~~~~~ WIFI/USB<>PC > > But you did forget something! Actually you must write: > > MIC <> USB SOUND CARD <> PC/Netbook <> USB/WIFI ~~~~~~~ WIFI/USB<>PC > > And this is what i don't need. The power consumption, weight, size, costs > are to high and a PC is not necessary. > > But now i found this: > http://www.amazon.de/Kamera-%C3%9Cberwachungskamera-Empf%C3%A4nger-Zubeh%C3%B6r-Wireless/dp/B004AZL6AE/ref=pd_cp_ce_2 > > It is a WLAN camera+ audio. Actually i don't need the camera, just the > tone. The remote system runs on batteries, just as i need. Maybe the > camera can be removed or disconnected. The question is, what is the > dynamic range and frequency range (0...24 kHz?, maybe not!) and are there > any "sound effecs" which are unwanted here. 49 EUR, that would be fine if > it works as desired. Maybe the audio chip could be replaced by a better > one?! But maybe it is all in one... > > Has someone ever played with such a system or are there alternatives that > i didn't found so far? > > Sounds like OT but such a system could be a revolution for LF/MF/VLF > reception, when thinking about local QRM problems! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > > > Am 08.03.2014 16:29, schrieb IK1WVQ Mauro: >> Hi Stefan >> it is not completely compliant to your requests, but, if you do not find >> the right equipment, you can consider the "baby monitor" at 860 MHz .. >> some units are digital, and you can route the sound output to the line >> input of the sound card of your PC . >> In free space, without antennas, you can obtain near 300 meters.. >> the system is "near" legal (you can consider your new VLF receiver as a >> "baby" !!! hi!) >> >> 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ >> >> At 15.08 08/03/2014, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Again i spent some time to find a module which allows to transfer a >>> mircophone input signal via WLAN to the PC. Without success... >>> >>> To make things clear: >>> >>> The system has to consist of to parts: >>> >>> 1: The first one is battery supplied and has a microphone input (like a >>> cheap external USB soundcard) and a WLAN output, using an external >>> antenna and SMA plug. I.e.: Input: 3.5mm microphone jack. Output: SMA >>> WLAN antenna connector. >>> 2: The second part is connected to the PC and is a WLAN receiver that >>> appears as a normal external USB soundcard and allows to receive the >>> audio signal from the first part of the system. >>> >>> The system allows to run a /p receiver for VLF or any other band. >>> >>> >>> An expert could create such a circuit for himselfe but i need to buy >>> something like that, if it is available. But all i can find in the web >>> is the opposite way, i.e. people who want to transfer their sound from >>> the PC to a /p loudspeaker or headphone, argh... Or, a big device which >>> includes a real big microphone (dynamic range ???). These are expensive >>> systems. >>> >>> However, external soundcards are cheap and WLAN modules are cheap too. >>> >>> So, isn't there such a device for a few EUR in the web, these days? It >>> has to have a dynamic range of at least 100 dB, like the 2 EUR external >>> soundcards at amazon do (with some luck). >>> >>> Any help is much apprechiated :-) >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >