Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp6486igc; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:01:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.202.230 with SMTP id kl6mr12150277wjc.9.1393790496293; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:01:36 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id eu10si6772432wjb.152.2014.03.02.12.01.35 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:01:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WKCMN-0002DU-Ex for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:47:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WKCMM-0002DK-So for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:47:38 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s29.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.40]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WKCMK-0008P5-9C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:47:37 +0000 Received: from BLU180-W46 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s29.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:47:33 -0800 X-TMN: [JY976SAuNK3J8D37swRmRjlvccy+Hsi2] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:47:33 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: , ,<5313677A.2020400@abelian.org> <91EDCA349BE942929730C480D5D64F7F@White>,<5313813D.4000702@abelian.org> , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2014 19:47:33.0761 (UTC) FILETIME=[4148D710:01CF3650] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: G; I plan to manually change freq 10 MHz top of hour for couple three hours is all-should be no trouble-Bob From: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:42:28 +0000 Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help? Bob, [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 85ec4a6bf4b19214eecc06056d1d344b Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_8112a01c-7dc2-4442-b415-13dbcda80ff5_" Subject: RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_8112a01c-7dc2-4442-b415-13dbcda80ff5_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable G=3B I plan to manually change freq 10 MHz top of hour for couple three hours is= all-should be no trouble-Bob =20 From: g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sun=2C 2 Mar 2014 19:42:28 +0000 Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help? =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Bob=2C=0A= =0A= There are no more band =0A= slots left in the psk-map =2C we have used them =0A= all up =2C so your flying solo on this =0A= one ! =0A= =0A= Could be a job for Op4H =2C =0A= but the decoder is set to 8K .....not a problem =0A= for a SDR =2C set up =2C racal =0A= 6790gm has a synth bfo that can be =0A= set 8K off =2C don't know what other =0A= sets are about with that kind of =0A= bfo range =0A= =0A= I think Spec-Lab has a =0A= frequency convertor mode =2C never used it =2C =0A= not sure how the interface is configured =2C =0A= but if that can get the audio from say =0A= 1500 hz upto 8KHz in software =2C then =0A= that opens up some possibilities =0A= =0A= 73-G=2C =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= From: Bob Raide =0A= Sent: Sunday=2C March 02=2C 2014 7:25 PM=0A= To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A= =0A= Subject: RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?=0A= =0A= Paul=3B Jay and Stefan and you suggested I should =0A= transmit carrier for 1 hour on 29.49900 then move up 10 MHz [29.49901] for = hour =0A= and back again a few times and then will start QRSS180. Does that make =0A= sense? Bob =20 =0A= > Date: Sun=2C 2 Mar 2014 19:06:37 +0000 > From: vlf0403@abelian.org > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > =0A= Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help? >=20 > > I will be running =0A= in QRSS 180 tonight. >=20 > Good luck. After last night's test maybe a =0A= few more receivers > will be listening on 29499 Hz. I'm sure this signal =0A= will go > a lot further than UK. It counts as a strong signal here > =0A= and there is 10 or 20dB or more (depending on rx bandwidth) > in hand to =0A= reach further into Europe. >=20 > More plots: a graph of signal level =0A= and phase=2C 10 minute > averages stepping 5 minutes. >=20 > =0A= http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140302k.gif >=20 > The background =0A= noise is plotted after sferic blanking. >=20 > On the spectrogram it =0A= looks like the noise tails off more > sharply between 04:00 and 04:30 but =0A= when I actually plot > the noise it's a quite smooth decline. But the =0A= signal is > gradually coming up hence the appearance of a 'window' in =0A= the > 2 or 3 hours before dawn. >=20 > For comparison=2C NAA at =0A= 24kHz during the same period >=20 > =0A= http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140302m.gif >=20 > Some pronounced =0A= dips during the night at 29499 Hz don't appear > in the NAA =0A= record. >=20 > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > =0A= = --_8112a01c-7dc2-4442-b415-13dbcda80ff5_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
G=3B
I plan to =3Bmanuall= y change freq 10 MHz top of hour for couple three hours is all-should be no= trouble-Bob
 =3B
From: g8fzk@g8fzk.= fsnet.co.uk
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Sun=2C 2 Mar 2014 = 19:42:28 +0000
Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A=
Bob=2C
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
There =3B are =3B no =3B more  = =3B band =3B =0A= slots =3B left =3B in the =3B psk-map =3B=2C we =3B hav= e used them =3B =0A= all =3B up  =3B=2C so =3B your =3B flying =3B solo = =3B on this =3B =0A= one =3B !
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
Could be =3B a =3B job =3B for = =3B Op4H =2C =3B =0A= but the =3B decoder is =3B set to =3B 8K .....not =3B a pro= blem =3B =0A= for =3B =3B a =3B SDR =3B =2C set =3B up =3B =2C&nb= sp=3B racal =0A= 6790gm =3B =3B has a =3B synth =3B bfo =3B that =3B= can be =3B =0A= set =3B 8K off =3B =2C don't =3B know =3B what =3B othe= r =3B =0A= sets =3B are =3B about =3B with =3B that =3B kind = =3B of =3B =0A= bfo =3B range
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
I think =3B Spec-Lab =3B =3B =3B = has a =3B =0A= frequency =3B =3B convertor =3B mode =2C never  =3Bused&nbs= p=3B it =3B =2C =0A= not =3B sure =3B how the =3B interface =3B is =3B confi= gured =2C =0A= but =3B if that =3B can get the =3B audio =3B =3B from&= nbsp=3B say =0A= 1500 =3B hz =3B upto =3B 8KHz =3B in software =3B =2C t= hen =3B =0A= that =3B opens =3B  =3B up some =3B possibilities =0A=
 =3B
=0A=
73-G=2C
=0A=
=0A=

=0A=
=0A=
From: Bob Raide
=0A=
Sent: Sunday=2C March 02=2C 2014 7:25 PM
=0A= =0A=
Subject: RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help?
=0A=

=0A=
Paul=3B
Jay =3Band Stefan =3Band you suggested = I should =0A= transmit carrier for 1 hour on 29.49900 then move up 10 MHz [29.49901] for = hour =0A= and back again a few times and then will start QRSS180. =3B Does that m= ake =0A= sense? Bob
 =3B
=0A=
>=3B Date: Sun=2C 2 Mar 2014 19:06:37 +0000
>=3B From: vlf0403@abelian.org
>=3B To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
>=3B =0A= Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help?
>=3B
>=3B >=3B I will= be running =0A= in QRSS 180 tonight.
>=3B
>=3B Good luck. After last night's tes= t maybe a =0A= few more receivers
>=3B will be listening on 29499 Hz. I'm sure this s= ignal =0A= will go
>=3B a lot further than UK. It counts as a strong signal here<= br>>=3B =0A= and there is 10 or 20dB or more (depending on rx bandwidth)
>=3B in ha= nd to =0A= reach further into Europe.
>=3B
>=3B More plots: a graph of sign= al level =0A= and phase=2C 10 minute
>=3B averages stepping 5 minutes.
>=3B >=3B =0A= http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140302k.gif
>=3B
>=3B The backg= round =0A= noise is plotted after sferic blanking.
>=3B
>=3B On the spectro= gram it =0A= looks like the noise tails off more
>=3B sharply between 04:00 and 04:= 30 but =0A= when I actually plot
>=3B the noise it's a quite smooth decline. But t= he =0A= signal is
>=3B gradually coming up hence the appearance of a 'window' = in =0A= the
>=3B 2 or 3 hours before dawn.
>=3B
>=3B For comparison= =2C NAA at =0A= 24kHz during the same period
>=3B
>=3B =0A= http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140302m.gif
>=3B
>=3B Some pron= ounced =0A= dips during the night at 29499 Hz don't appear
>=3B in the NAA =0A= record.
>=3B
>=3B --
>=3B Paul Nicholson
>=3B --
&g= t=3B =0A=
= --_8112a01c-7dc2-4442-b415-13dbcda80ff5_--