Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp234487igc; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:09:50 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.92.38 with SMTP id cj6mr3522435wjb.70.1394046589218; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:09:49 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t1si1494864wjx.67.2014.03.05.11.09.48 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WLGfV-0003mR-LQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:35:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WLGfV-0003mI-59 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:35:49 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s26.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.37]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGfT-0007Rg-9W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 18:35:48 +0000 Received: from BLU180-W39 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s26.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:35:45 -0800 X-TMN: [uOIa1jhqFkAskdonJJBv0AL6xtDiLeH5] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:35:45 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: <5316EA0B.4020001@abelian.org> <004001cf3870$27cb9620$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <53173FCD.9010808@abelian.org>, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2014 18:35:45.0816 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8C9D980:01CF38A1] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Markus; Yes, 9 kHz is next or better yet "ELF"! I have to come up with more antenna height. 200' minimum so could run more than 200 watts without burning down the house! Uwe in Deutchland has developed a great signal that has already hit Iceland. Someone this side should be able to see him. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.37 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: fce77e88417377663dedf94f027ec622 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_04b481b0-8bce-46cf-8b90-9023fd76845f_" Subject: RE: LF: Re: VLF 29501, signal? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_04b481b0-8bce-46cf-8b90-9023fd76845f_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Markus=3B Yes=2C 9 kHz is next or better yet "ELF"! =20 I have to come up with more antenna height. 200' minimum so could run more= than 200 watts without burning down the house! Uwe in Deutchland has developed a great signal that has already hit Icela= nd. Someone this side should be able to see him. =20 From: markusvester@aol.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: paul@abelian.netcom.co.uk Date: Wed=2C 5 Mar 2014 18:39:28 +0100 Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501=2C signal? =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Paul=2C Dex=2C Bob=2C=0A= =0A= wow=2C I am very much impressed by this work! =0A= =0A= =0A= So it seems there's three to share the honour of =0A= the first amateur VLF atlantic crossing. Funny that history seems =0A= to repeat itself - remember the unusual outcome of the strive towards the = =0A= Peter Bobek award?=0A= =0A= Now I'm curious who'll achieve the first =0A= detection below 9 kHz!=0A= =0A= Best 73=2C=0A= Markus (DF6NM)=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= From: Paul Nicholson =0A= Sent: Wednesday=2C March 05=2C 2014 4:16 PM=0A= To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A= =0A= Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501=2C signal?=0A= An exchange of PMs confirms that Dex was transmitting at that =0A= time on 29501 Hz. Comparison of average signal level in 55uHz =0A= bandwidth from 02:00 to 07:00 UT http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/140305a.png =0A= Bob: 24dB S/N Dex: 14dB S/N WH2XBA/4 line not so sharp=2C =0A= just noise or is that a bit of a wobble of the carrier =0A= phase? -- Paul Nicholson -- = --_04b481b0-8bce-46cf-8b90-9023fd76845f_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Markus=3B
Yes=2C 9 kHz is nex= t or better yet "ELF"! =3B
I have to come up with more antenna heig= ht. =3B 200' minimum so could run more than 200 watts without burning d= own the house!
Uwe =3B in Deutchland =3B has developed a great s= ignal that has already hit Iceland. =3B Someone this side should be abl= e to see him.
 =3B

From: markusveste= r@aol.com
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
CC: paul@abelian.netcom.co= .uk
Date: Wed=2C 5 Mar 2014 18:39:28 +0100
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF 2= 9501=2C signal?

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A=
Paul=2C Dex=2C Bob=2C
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
wow=2C I am very much impressed by thi= s work! =0A=
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
So it seems there's three to share the= honour of =0A= the =3Bfirst amateur VLF atlantic crossing. =3BFunny that history&n= bsp=3Bseems =0A= to repeat itself - remember the unusual outcome of the =3Bstrive toward= s the =0A= Peter Bobek award?
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
Now =3BI'm curious who'll =3Ba= chieve the first =0A= detection below 9 kHz!
=0A=
 =3B
=0A=
Best 73=2C
=0A=
Markus (DF6NM)
=0A=
 =3B =3B =3B
= =0A=
 =3B
=0A=
=0A=

=0A=
=0A= =0A=
Sent: Wednesday=2C March 05=2C 2014 4:16 PM
=0A= =0A=
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF 29501=2C signal?
=0A=

An exchange of PMs confirms that Dex was transmitting
at = that =0A= time on 29501 Hz.

Comparison of average signal level in 55uHz =0A= bandwidth
from 02:00 to 07:00 UT

 =3B http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/14= 0305a.png

 =3B =0A= Bob: 24dB S/N

 =3B Dex: 14dB S/N

WH2XBA/4 line not so sha= rp=2C =0A= just noise or is that a bit
of a wobble of the carrier =0A= phase?

--
Paul Nicholson
--

= --_04b481b0-8bce-46cf-8b90-9023fd76845f_--