Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp5522igc; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:26:56 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.10.72 with SMTP id g8mr92731lab.50.1393788415708; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:26:55 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jn5si11311297lbc.156.2014.03.02.11.26.55 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:26:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WKC1R-0001db-7b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:26:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WKC1Q-0001dR-OM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:26:00 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s35.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.46]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WKC1O-0008DZ-Pi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:25:59 +0000 Received: from BLU180-W12 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s35.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:25:57 -0800 X-TMN: [WX1SS7demomuTz1phU279GJMpGxH2xvK] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:25:56 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <5313813D.4000702@abelian.org> References: , ,<5313677A.2020400@abelian.org> <91EDCA349BE942929730C480D5D64F7F@White>,<5313813D.4000702@abelian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2014 19:25:57.0273 (UTC) FILETIME=[3C847890:01CF364D] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul; Jay and Stefan and you suggested I should transmit carrier for 1 hour on 29.49900 then move up 10 MHz [29.49901] for hour and back again a few times and then will start QRSS180. Does that make sense? Bob [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.46 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: bde53fa3678f346afe39dd99e3e185db Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_d61cd6bc-9a31-481d-acca-c7bd9cefe61a_" Subject: RE: LF: Would slower QRSS help? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_d61cd6bc-9a31-481d-acca-c7bd9cefe61a_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul=3B Jay and Stefan and you suggested I should transmit carrier for 1 hour on 29= .49900 then move up 10 MHz [29.49901] for hour and back again a few times a= nd then will start QRSS180. Does that make sense? Bob =20 > Date: Sun=2C 2 Mar 2014 19:06:37 +0000 > From: vlf0403@abelian.org > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help? >=20 > > I will be running in QRSS 180 tonight. >=20 > Good luck. After last night's test maybe a few more receivers > will be listening on 29499 Hz. I'm sure this signal will go > a lot further than UK. It counts as a strong signal here > and there is 10 or 20dB or more (depending on rx bandwidth) > in hand to reach further into Europe. >=20 > More plots: a graph of signal level and phase=2C 10 minute > averages stepping 5 minutes. >=20 > http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140302k.gif >=20 > The background noise is plotted after sferic blanking. >=20 > On the spectrogram it looks like the noise tails off more > sharply between 04:00 and 04:30 but when I actually plot > the noise it's a quite smooth decline. But the signal is > gradually coming up hence the appearance of a 'window' in the > 2 or 3 hours before dawn. >=20 > For comparison=2C NAA at 24kHz during the same period >=20 > http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140302m.gif >=20 > Some pronounced dips during the night at 29499 Hz don't appear > in the NAA record. >=20 > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >=20 = --_d61cd6bc-9a31-481d-acca-c7bd9cefe61a_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Paul=3B
Jay =3Band Stefan=  =3Band you suggested I should transmit carrier for 1 hour on 29.49900 = then move up 10 MHz [29.49901] for hour and back again a few times and then= will start QRSS180. =3B Does that make sense? Bob
 =3B
= >=3B Date: Sun=2C 2 Mar 2014 19:06:37 +0000
>=3B From: vlf0403@abeli= an.org
>=3B To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>=3B Subject: Re: LF= : Would slower QRSS help?
>=3B
>=3B >=3B I will be running in= QRSS 180 tonight.
>=3B
>=3B Good luck. After last night's test= maybe a few more receivers
>=3B will be listening on 29499 Hz. I'm s= ure this signal will go
>=3B a lot further than UK. It counts as a s= trong signal here
>=3B and there is 10 or 20dB or more (depending on r= x bandwidth)
>=3B in hand to reach further into Europe.
>=3B
= >=3B More plots: a graph of signal level and phase=2C 10 minute
>=3B= averages stepping 5 minutes.
>=3B
>=3B http://abelian.org/vlf= /tmp/29499_140302k.gif
>=3B
>=3B The background noise is plotted= after sferic blanking.
>=3B
>=3B On the spectrogram it looks li= ke the noise tails off more
>=3B sharply between 04:00 and 04:30 but w= hen I actually plot
>=3B the noise it's a quite smooth decline. But = the signal is
>=3B gradually coming up hence the appearance of a 'wind= ow' in the
>=3B 2 or 3 hours before dawn.
>=3B
>=3B For com= parison=2C NAA at 24kHz during the same period
>=3B
>=3B http:= //abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140302m.gif
>=3B
>=3B Some pronounce= d dips during the night at 29499 Hz don't appear
>=3B in the NAA recor= d.
>=3B
>=3B --
>=3B Paul Nicholson
>=3B --
>=3B =
= --_d61cd6bc-9a31-481d-acca-c7bd9cefe61a_--